Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
49.408 skill-uri din 2.375 de depozite · actualizat acum 2 minute
49.408 skill-uri
- kaltstart-interviewKlotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-rechtFür /kaltstart-interview: routet Rolle, Frist, Unterlagen und Fachschritt; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: Produkthaftung und Produktrecht.PlanificareFără avertismente★ 1,8 K↓ —
- nda-typen-vergleichKlotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-rechtFür NDA-Typen Vergleich: entwickelt Ziel, Vergleich und Eskalation; Ergebnis: Verhandlungs- oder Eskalationslinie.JuridicFără avertismente★ 1,8 K↓ —
- bigquery-migration-sql-translatorgoogle/skillsTranslates SQL queries, DDL schemas, and stored procedures from legacy database dialects (Teradata, Oracle, Redshift, Snowflake, SparkSQL, HiveQL) to BigQuery GoogleSQL using the BigQuery Migration Service (BQMS) MCP server. Use when translating legacy SQL queries, migrating schemas or metadata zip archives, or configuring BigQuery Migration Service (BQMS) YAML translation settings. Don't use for executing BigQuery queries or managing datasets and tables (use bigquery-basics), diagnosing runtime job errors (use bigquery-troubleshooting), or tuning slot reservations (use bigquery-optimization).OficialDateFără avertismente★ 21,8 K↓ —
- video-podcast-maker-nanoAgents365-ai/video-podcast-makerSmallest personal narrated-explainer-video pipeline (spoken narration over visuals, not an audio podcast), fully tool-agnostic and autonomous by default — topic → research ∥ asset collection → script → TTS → video → 4K render ∥ publish info + cover. The skill defines the pipeline logic and self-verified checkpoints; any TTS backend and any video tool (Remotion, HyperFrames, CapCut, ...) work, and how much human oversight to apply is set by the working project's AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md, not here. Use when the user wants a quick personal narrated video with minimal steps, whether or not they name the tool stack. Do NOT trigger for audio-only podcasts, written episodic content, or heavy multi-format production.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,7 K↓ —
- dev-commitcodeaholicguy/ai-devkitAI DevKit · Safe git commit workflow for AI coding agents. Use when the user asks to commit, prepare a commit, stage changes, create a PR-ready checkpoint, or finish work with a conventional commit while avoiding unrelated user changes.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,7 K↓ —
- process-designcbrock84/headcountDesigns, documents, and fixes operational processes — mapping the current state, finding where work actually stalls, redesigning the flow, and building controls that hold. Use this when the same failure keeps recurring, when a handoff between teams is unreliable, when onboarding a repeated task, when work takes far longer than the work itself, or when deciding whether to automate, standardize, or eliminate a process.DesignFără avertismente★ 2,6 K↓ —
- hsb-appNVIDIA/skillsDiscover and run Holoscan Sensor Bridge example applications on a connected devkit. Filters available apps by the user's platform, HSB software version, board type, and sensors. Supports timed execution, failure analysis, code-edit suggestions, and iterative re-runs.RedactareFără avertismente★ 3,8 K↓ —
- cikm-camera-readybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when turning an accepted CIKM paper into its ACM proceedings version inside the short notification-to-camera-ready window, covering de-anonymization, the e-rights and TAPS pipeline into the ACM Digital Library, CCS concepts and metadata, GenAI-disclosure retention, artifact link publication, and Rome presentation logistics.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cell-star-methodsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse to build Cell's mandatory STAR Methods — the Key Resources Table, the three Resource Availability subsections, Experimental Model and Subject Details, Method Details, and Quantification and Statistical Analysis, in the exact required order.AlteleFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- atc-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ATC (ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference, formerly USENIX ATC) submission is evaluated — the two-round extended-abstract model, the round-one gate by two reviewers, the round-two read by 3-4 reviewers, double-blind reviewing, rebuttal, conditional acceptance with shepherding, and how ATC differs from OSDI/SOSP/NSDI.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- cav-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) submission is evaluated, covering the two-stage reviewing process (two reviews then an early-reject filter, then two more reviews with a rebuttal), the partial double-anonymity by category, the accept/reject outcome, the optional non-conditional artifact evaluation, and how CAV differs from TACAS and FMCAD.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- ase-review-processbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when reasoning about how an ASE (IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering) research submission is evaluated, covering double-anonymous review, the early-rejection stage before rebuttal, the Accept / Revision / Reject outcomes, the criteria-bound revision round, and how ASE's process differs from FSE's PACMSE Major Revision, ICSE's cycles, and ISSTA's rounds.InginerieFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-writing-stylebrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when revising an IEEE VIS paper for a task-grounded visualization contribution on the first page, a design rationale that ties each visual encoding and interaction to a task, evaluation matched to the contribution type, honest limitations, and disciplined use of the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget for a paper that will be read as an IEEE TVCG journal article.RedactareFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vldb-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a VLDB paper, covering workload and dataset realism at scale, competitor tuning fairness, scalability curves versus single points, tail-latency and throughput reporting, ablations that isolate the mechanism, and the loss-case disclosure PVLDB reviewers look for first.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wacv-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing WACV experiments, covering Applications-track systems evidence (latency, power, robustness under real constraints) versus Algorithms-track matched-baseline novelty, comparative assessment under the deployed condition, uncertainty over seeds and sessions, ablations, and evidence that survives the two-round review.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- aaai-related-workbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- wsdm-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a WSDM paper - offline ranking and recommendation metrics with bias controls, temporal-split protocols for interaction logs, baseline selection from recent WSDM/SIGIR/KDD editions, ablations that isolate the mechanism, efficiency reporting, and online-evidence framing.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- sosp-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SOSP paper — mapping every claim to an experiment, choosing baselines a systems PC will accept as fair, mixing microbenchmarks with end-to-end and failure runs, reporting tails and overheads honestly, and isolating the mechanism the design credits.DesignFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- vis-supplementarybrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding what belongs in an IEEE VIS paper body versus its supplemental materials, covering the VGTC/TVCG 9+2 page budget, the supplemental video that VIS reviewers routinely watch, the one-week supplemental deadline extension, double-blind supplemental anonymization, and how to split a visualization paper between the reviewed pages and the archive.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- socc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing ACM SoCC evaluations, covering real or realistic deployments over simulation, production or representative workloads and traces, tail-latency and cost as first-class metrics, fair tuned baselines, scale and multi-tenancy behavior, reproducible measurement pipelines, and matching evidence to the shape of each cloud claim.DevOpsFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- stoc-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when judging whether computation belongs in a STOC (ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing) paper at all — STOC accepts on theorems, with no empirical-evaluation expectation — and when it does, scoping it as certified proof computation, constructive search, or clearly labeled illustration rather than benchmarking.MediaFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pods-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing the analytical "evidence" of an ACM PODS paper — worst-case and average-case analyses, matching upper and lower bounds, dichotomy completeness, correct complexity assumptions, and the occasional empirical validation when a theory paper claims practicality — matching the rigor to the shape of each theoretical claim.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- popl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing the empirical component of a POPL paper — deciding whether evidence should be a mechanization, a prototype, case studies, or benchmarks; reporting proof effort and case-study coverage honestly; and keeping performance numbers in a supporting role so the formal claim stays the paper's center of gravity.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
- pldi-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing a PLDI evaluation — choosing defensible benchmark suites and baseline compiler configurations, measuring runtime, compile time, and memory with warmup and variance discipline, running ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, and scoping claims to the platforms measured.ProductivitateFără avertismente★ 1,4 K↓ —
eval-driven-dev
github/awesome-copilot
TestareActualizat acum 17 ore
De la autor
Improve AI application with evaluation-driven development. Define eval criteria, instrument the application, build golden datasets, observe and evaluate application runs, analyze results, and produce a concrete action plan for improvements. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user asks to set up QA, add tests, add evals, evaluate, benchmark, fix wrong behaviors, improve quality, or do quality assurance for any Python project that calls an LLM model.
Instalare
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill eval-driven-dev -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/eval-driven-dev/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
La ce are acces
Rulează scripturile incluseNu am văzut acces la rețeaLicență: MIT
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
- Include scripturi pe care nu le-am verificatScăzut
De ce 89
Securitate85
Proveniență95
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție71
Fișiere (19)
- SKILL.md
- references/1-a-project-analysis.md
- references/1-b-entry-point.md
- references/1-c-eval-criteria.md
- references/2a-instrumentation.md
- references/2b-implement-runnable.md
- references/2c-capture-and-verify-trace.md
- references/3-define-evaluators.md
- references/4-build-dataset.md
- references/5-run-tests.md
- references/6-analyze-outcomes.md
- references/evaluators.md
- încă 7