Skill-uri pentru agenți pe care le poți verifica înainte să le instalezi
Skill-uri SKILL.md publice din depozite GitHub cu peste 50 de stele și de la producători, scanate și evaluate. Instalează oricare dintre ele cu o singură comandă în Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot sau Gemini CLI.
9.277 de skill-uri din 267 de depozite · actualizat acum 29 de minute
708 skill-uri
- web-researchbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsSearches multiple web sources, synthesizes findings, and produces cited research reports using delegated subagents. Use when the user asks to research a topic online, search the web, look something up, find current information, compare options, or produce a research report.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- hudbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsDiverga HUD (Heads-Up Display) management skill. Configure and manage the research project statusline display. Supports multiple presets: research, checkpoint, memory, minimal. Triggers: "hud", "statusline", "display settings"ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- x1brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsResearch Guardian - Ethics Advisory & Bias Detection across all research stages Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Surface-level screening, deep contextual analysis, constructive recommendations Use when: reviewing research ethics, checking for bias, assessing trustworthiness, QRP screening Triggers: ethics review, IRB, bias detection, QRP, trustworthiness, research integrity, p-hacking, HARKingȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- i0brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsSystematic Review Pipeline Orchestrator - Coordinates systematic literature review automation Manages the complete 7-stage PRISMA 2020 pipeline from research question to RAG system Delegates to specialized agents (I1, I2, I3) while enforcing human checkpoints Use when: conducting systematic reviews, building knowledge repositories, PRISMA automation Triggers: systematic review, PRISMA, literature review automationȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- b2brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsVS-Enhanced Evidence Quality Appraiser - Prevents Mode Collapse with context-adaptive quality assessment Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids automatic tool application, delivers research-specific evaluation strategies Use when: appraising study quality, assessing risk of bias, grading evidence Triggers: quality appraisal, RoB, GRADE, Newcastle-Ottawa, risk of bias, methodological qualityȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- grant-proposalbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsDraft a structured grant proposal from research ideas and literature. Supports KAKENHI (Japan), NSF (US), NSFC (China, including 面上/青年/优青/杰青/海外优青/重点), ERC (EU), DFG (Germany), SNSF (Switzerland), ARC (Australia), NWO (Netherlands), and generic formats. Use when user says "write grant", "grant proposal", "申請書", "write KAKENHI", "科研費", "基金申请", "写基金", "NSF proposal", or wants to turn research ideas into a funding application.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- b1brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsVS-Enhanced Literature Review Strategist - Comprehensive support for multiple review methodologies Full VS 5-Phase process: Prevents Mode Collapse and presents creative search strategies Supports: Systematic Review (PRISMA 2020), Scoping Review (JBI/PRISMA-ScR), Meta-Synthesis, Realist Synthesis, Narrative Review, Rapid Review Use when: conducting any type of literature review, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, finding prior research Triggers: literature review, PRISMA, systematic review, scoping review, meta-synthesis, realist synthesis, narrative review, rapid reviewȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- a1brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsVS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research ideaȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- paper-writingbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when drafting, rewriting, reviewing, or auditing prose for any section of an empirical academic paper (Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Data, Results, Discussion, Conclusion) or specialized output (job market paper, grant proposal, policy brief, referee response).ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- stata-toolkitbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsActivate when users mention Stata commands, .do files, regressions, econometrics, stored results, graphs, dataset inspection, replication, or Stata errors. Route the task through mcp-stata tools and the specialized research skills instead of treating it as plain text coding.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- paper-writewanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepDraft LaTeX paper section by section from an outline. Use when user says "写论文", "write paper", "draft LaTeX", "开始写", or wants to generate LaTeX content from a paper plan.ȘtiințăVerifică întâi★ 17,8 K↓ —
- paper-2-webforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsUse when converting academic papers into dissemination assets such as Paper2Web websites, Paper2Video video abstracts, or Paper2Poster conference posters from LaTeX or PDF sources.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 3,7 K↓ —
- risobergside/awesome-design-skillsA playful, joyful, two-color risograph print aesthetic built on a single warm off-white paper surface running through every sectionȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 3,3 K↓ —
- research-refinebrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsTurn a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, elegant, frontier-aware, implementation-oriented method plan via iterative GPT-5.4 review. Use when the user says "refine my approach", "帮我细化方案", "decompose this problem", "打磨idea", "refine research plan", "细化研究方案", or wants a concrete research method that stays simple, focused, and top-venue ready instead of a vague or overbuilt idea.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- research-reviewbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsGet a deep critical review of research from GPT via Codex MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- claudebergside/awesome-design-skillsA research-journal aesthetic printed on warm stone — authoritative, editorial, almost achromatic. Pages live on warm ivory parchment (never pure white), with near-black slate as the dominant ink.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 3,3 K↓ —
- reference-verifybrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsVerify references in an academic paper: check whether each BibTeX entry is real, whether in-text citations match the cited paper's actual content, and produce a structured verification report. Use when user says "验证参考文献", "ref verify", "check references", "核实引用", "引用是否正确", or wants to audit citations in a LaTeX manuscript.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- result-to-claimbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. Codex MCP evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- novelty-checkbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsVerify research idea novelty against recent literature. Use when user says "查新", "novelty check", "有没有人做过", "check novelty", or wants to verify a research idea is novel before implementing.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- paper-writingbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsWorkflow 3: Full paper writing pipeline. Orchestrates paper-plan → paper-figure → paper-write → paper-compile → auto-paper-improvement-loop to go from a narrative report to a polished, submission-ready PDF. Use when user says "写论文全流程", "write paper pipeline", "从报告到PDF", "paper writing", or wants the complete paper generation workflow.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- semantic-scholarbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsSearch published venue papers (IEEE, ACM, Springer, etc.) via Semantic Scholar API. Complements /arxiv (preprints) with citation counts, venue metadata, and TLDR. Use when user says "search semantic scholar", "find IEEE papers", "find journal papers", "venue papers", "citation search", or wants published literature beyond arXiv preprints.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- game-theory-paper-writerbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsGenerate, continue, revise, polish, and stress-test game theory research papers. Use when the user provides a game theory topic, phenomenon, draft, outline, model idea, literature anchor, reviewer comments, or asks for 博弈论论文生成, 选题建模, 文献迁移, 模型修正, 均衡分析, 数值模拟, 论文润色, 改稿打磨, or R&R response work.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- orchestratorbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUnified Agent Teams orchestrator for Diverga v12.0.0. Manages Agent Teams creation, VS Arena debate, and subagent dispatch. Single entry point for all parallel/debate workflows. Replaces research-orchestrator and vs-arena skills. Triggers: orchestrator, agent team, create team, parallel agents, debate, competing, collaborate, VS ArenaȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —
- novelty-checkbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsVerify research idea novelty against recent literature. Use when user says "查新", "novelty check", "有没有人做过", "check novelty", or wants to verify a research idea is novel before implementing.ȘtiințăFără avertismente★ 4,7 K↓ —