ds-verify-loop
De la autor
Run edit, real check, read the actual error, fix the root cause, rerun, until the check passes or the cap is hit. Use when you change code that has tests, a type checker, a build, or a runnable app, or before you claim any fix works. Invoke as /ds-verify-loop.
Instalare
npx skills add aicodeking/deepseek-stack --skill ds-verify-loop -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/ds-verify-loop/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 83
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- ds-plan-loopaicodeking/deepseek-stackWrite a numbered plan with an acceptance check for each step, critique it once in a fresh pass, revise it, then execute one step at a time. Use when a task touches more than one file, has unclear scope, or failed before because steps were missed. Invoke as /ds-plan-loop.Planificare★ 114
- browser-test-loopOneWave-AI/claude-skillsUse to actually verify a web change in a real browser instead of assuming it works — click through a flow, catch console errors, check a form submits, confirm a fix on the page. Trigger when a UI change needs proof, a bug only reproduces in the browser, or the user asks to test, check, or screenshot the running app.Testare★ 409
- run-testsGoldziher/ai-rulezRuns the project's unit tests and reports failures. Use when the user asks to run tests.Testare★ 166
- verifyericrisco/rsc-harnessUse when implementation is finished and about to be called done or merged — the rsc-sdd evidence gate: runs the stack's scripts/verify.sh (lint, type, test, audit), walks every task done-check and acceptance criterion, records a dated verdict. NOT judging the diff by eye (that is `review`, spec-less `code-review`), NOT diagnosis (that is `debug`).Testare★ 435
- testavibebuilder/claude-primeUse when the user wants to know if something works — the answer requires running code, not analyzing it. Output is a verdict backed by evidence: passed, failed, or broken. Primary triggers: 'run the tests', 'does X still work after my change?', 'did the merge break anything?', 'verify the fix worked', 'check if the endpoint returns X', 'confirm nothing regressed', 'run tests/unit/test_foo.py', 'let me know the results', 'make sure my changes didn't break anything'. Hard stops — do NOT use for: reviewing test code for quality/coverage gaps, debugging why test infrastructure/databases/seed scripts are misbehaving, writing or fixing tests, diagnosing root causes of unexpected behavior. The deciding question: is the user asking for the result of executing something, or asking for help understanding/analyzing/improving something? If it's the latter, use diagnose or review-code instead.Testare★ 119
- verify-appEricTechPro/super-boardRun affected app feature checks, inspect evidence, or maintain this project's verifier when source or accepted behavior changes.Altele★ 585
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te