red-green-proof
De la autor
Turns a suspected bug into a proven one. Verify the cause against reality before claiming it, write a test that FAILS on the current code, apply the fix, watch it pass — then revert the fix and confirm the test goes red again, because a test that passes both ways proves nothing. Invoked bare after a debugging conversation, it takes the target from context rather than asking. Use when fixing a bug, investigating an incident, hardening a flaky area, or when asked to "add tests that reveal the bug". Triggers on "/red-green-proof", "prove the bug", "red-green", "make the test fail first", "is that test load-bearing", "reveal the bug with a test".
Instalare
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill red-green-proof -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/red-green-proof/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
- Include scripturi pe care nu le-am verificatScăzut
De ce 88
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- tdd-bug-fixrshankras/claude-code-apple-skillsFix bugs using red-green-refactor — reproduce the bug as a failing test first, then fix it. Use when fixing bugs to ensure they never regress.Testare★ 842
- test-driven-developmentaddyosmani/agent-skillsDrives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality. Use when asked to add tests to a function, fix a bug in it or change its behavior, even when the code is pasted inline and the request does not mention tests.Testare★ 111.9K
- regression-proofNeeeophytee/finding-unknowns-skillsFix a reported bug with a regression test that demonstrably fails on the original behavior and passes after the fix. Use when implementing a bug fix or checking whether a proposed fix actually addresses a reported failure. Not a general coverage audit or new-feature workflow.Testare★ 358
- false-green-testsreticlehq/reticleFind out why the tests pass but the app is broken. Catches false greens: a green suite over a feature that does not work, a mocked API standing in for a real one, an assertion that holds no matter what the app does, a click handler wired to nothing. Use when the suite is green and the user says it is broken, when a test never fails, when coverage looks fine but bugs still ship, or before trusting a passing run you did not watch.Testare★ 1.3K
- testhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsWrite or assess tests that prove behavior and would fail without the fix. Use when: writing tests, TDD, or asked whether a green test is enough.Testare★ 1.5K
- diagnoseKerberosClaw/kc_ai_skillsUse when the user reports misbehaving software to investigate — a bug, crash, wrong output, flaky behavior, or '為什麼壞掉/不會動/查一下' — and the root cause is not yet established. Enforces building a red-capable reproduction command BEFORE any hypothesis is allowed, then 3-5 ranked falsifiable hypotheses before testing any single one. NOT for conceptual questions, code reading requests, or feature work. When a failing command already exists, Step 1 is pre-satisfied — still apply, jumping straight to the hypothesis discipline.Testare★ 79
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te