policy-review-cycle-refresh
De la autor
Use this skill when the periodic policy review is due or overdue, or someone asks "run the annual policy review", "our policies are out of date", "re-approve the policies before the audit", "what changed since the last review", "policy version history" or "who needs to sign off which policy". Collects what changed since each policy was last approved (incidents, findings, exceptions, new systems, law), proposes the edits per policy, separates editorial from substantive changes, drafts the version history and approval record, and plans the communication to staff.
Instalare
npx skills add better-isms/grcskills --skill policy-review-cycle-refresh -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/policy-review-cycle-refresh/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 82
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- risk-register-hygiene-reviewbetter-isms/grcskillsUse this skill when an existing risk register needs a check before an audit, a management review or a new owner takes it over, or when someone asks "clean up our risk register", "is our risk register any good", "review the risk register before the audit", "our risks have not been updated", "find duplicate risks", "who owns these risks" or "the scores look wrong". Reads the register read-only and finds stale, duplicated, unowned, orphaned and mis-scored entries, risks missing given the company's own incidents and findings, and expired acceptances, then writes a findings file with a proposed fix per line for the owners to decide.Inginerie★ 51
- code-reviewflutter/agent-pluginsPerforms a comprehensive, multi-step code review of pull requests or local code changes, using iterative refinement (generation, critique, synthesis) to ensure high-quality, actionable feedback. Use when you need to review code changes thoroughly.OficialInginerie★ 3.1K
- update-docsDasDigitaleMomentum/opencode-processing-skillsUpdate existing project documentation after code changes. Detects outdated sections, updates module and feature docs, and ensures cross-references remain valid. Use this skill after implementing features, refactoring, or when documentation is known to be stale.Inginerie★ 60
- pr-review-fixTencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-ToolkitPeriodically analyze open pull requests for CI failures, code review feedback, and quality issues, then fix them in batch. Use this skill when the user asks to check PR status, triage CI failures, fix review comments, analyze open PRs, or run a scheduled PR health check across the repository.Inginerie★ 1.1K
- document-consistency-checkbetter-isms/grcskillsUse this skill when a set of policies, procedures, plans and registers has grown in pieces and someone asks "check our documents for contradictions", "are our policies consistent", "the retention periods don't match", "which severity scale is right", "harmonise our ISMS documents", "cross-check the incident plan against the policy" or "clean up our documentation before the audit". Extracts the checkable facts from every document (periods, deadlines, scales, roles, labels, references), finds contradictions, naming drift and broken references, proposes which document owns each fact, and drafts a glossary and a fix list for the owners.Planificare★ 51
- review-codeavibebuilder/claude-primeReview code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own changes, a teammate's patch, a PR, branch, commit, diff, staged changes, or one or more files to look over. Activate on requests like review, look over, sanity check, critique, code review, or 'is this good?' The key signal is that the user wants evaluation of existing code and its tradeoffs, not implementation, debugging, or explanation. This skill works independently, but when plans, specs, task artifacts, or prior discussion exist, use them to understand why the code exists before judging it.Inginerie★ 120
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te