refactor-structure
De la autor
Diagnoses and fixes a paper's argument architecture and narrative flow, independent of any venue. Checks whether the story is built in the right order, whether each section does its job, whether the intro promises what the body delivers, and whether the contribution -> evidence -> conclusion arc holds — then produces a restructuring plan (move / merge / split / cut sections) the author approves BEFORE anything is rewritten. Use when a researcher says "the structure is off", "it doesn't flow", "reviewers said it's hard to follow / disorganized / the story is unclear", "my intro over-promises", "related work is in the wrong place", "this section doesn't belong here", "reorganize my paper", "fix the narrative", or "the contributions don't match the results". Distinct from tailor-to-venue (venue/track fit, page limits, templates) and polish-prose (sentence-level wording). Bundles outline_extract.py to print the section tree + each section's opening sentence so the architecture is reviewable at a glance.
Instalare
npx skills add ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills --skill refactor-structure -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/refactor-structure/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
- Include scripturi pe care nu le-am verificatScăzut
De ce 76
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- narrative-buildingscdenney/open-science-skillsDrafts or audits a scientific paper’s introduction and framing — the real-world "why", an evidence audit, the funnel from theory to a falsifiable if-then with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and a contribution list matched to the design. Use when the user asks to write, restructure, or critique an introduction, motivate or frame a paper, repair a gap-in-the-literature opening, sharpen or calibrate a contribution claim, or connect experiments into one argument. Sentence-level flow and wording are out of scope.Design★ 69
- improve-architecturerohitg00/pro-workflowAudit an area of the codebase and propose the smallest structural moves that improve it - untangle boundaries, kill duplication, fix seams, break cycles. Produces a prioritized plan and decision records, not a rewrite. Use when a codebase feels tangled, hard to change, or is becoming a ball of mud, or when asked to improve or refactor architecture.Planificare★ 2.9K
- refactorgithub/awesome-copilotSurgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior. Covers extracting functions, renaming variables, breaking down god functions, improving type safety, eliminating code smells, and applying design patterns. Less drastic than repo-rebuilder; use for gradual improvements.Inginerie★ 40.4K
- code-refactoring-assistantArabelaTso/Skills-4-SESuggest and apply code refactorings to improve readability, maintainability, and code quality. Use this skill when improving existing code structure, eliminating code smells, applying design patterns, simplifying complex logic, extracting duplicated code, renaming for clarity, or preparing code for new features. Provides specific before/after examples, explains benefits, identifies risks, and ensures behavior preservation through tests.Inginerie★ 259
- paper-narrativeaipoch/open-scienceJudge and reshape the story told by an entire paper figure deck. Use when writing or revising a paper to derive a grounded brief from the manuscript and captions, review the full deck as a handling editor, and hand an ordered figure arc to `figure-composer`.Știință★ 5.4K
- literature-reviewseb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skillsConduct a structured literature review on a given topic by defining a search strategy, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracting key findings, and synthesizing results into a coherent academic review. Use when the user requests literature review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.Inginerie★ 229
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te