review-router
De la autor
Decide which review lanes a change actually needs, then run exactly those — instead of spawning the whole chain at every diff size. Reads the diff's shape and blast radius, maps the evidence to lanes (code, security, a11y, perf, design, build), estimates the cost, shows the routing decision, and executes it. Use when asked to "review this", "check this before I commit/merge", "is this ready", or "what should I run", and whenever a full review would cost more than the change is worth. Prefer this over full-review as the default entry point; full-review remains correct when the user explicitly asks for everything.
Instalare
npx skills add arcasilesgroup/ai-engineering --skill review-router -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/review-router/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 82
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- full-reviewarcasilesgroup/ai-engineeringRun every review skill at once — build-check, then design-check, code-audit, security-audit, a11y-audit and perf-audit fanned out across parallel agents — and merge them into one deduplicated, severity-ranked report. Use when asked for a full/complete review, to review everything before shipping or merging, or to run all the checks.Inginerie★ 61
- review-workwjgoarxiv/litgravityReview a plan before work or a diff after it in five lanes, findings first with file:line anchors. Use when asked if a plan, change or branch is right or safe.Inginerie★ 166
- reviewdzhng/skillsCloseout pass on a finished substantive change — sequence refactor-clean (shape), code-review (diff), and write-docs (docs) so all three run, in the order where each feeds the next. Use after implementing a slice or feature and before calling it done or committing; when the user asks for a final review, a cleanup-and-document pass, or to "review everything." For a diff-only audit, reach code-review directly.Inginerie★ 1.4K
- build-review-loopmoonlight-lupin/agent-skillsUse when the user says 'review loop N times', 'build then review', 'fix and re-review', or wants an iterative quality gate with different models building vs reviewing. Orchestrates N rounds of build-review-fix using Cursor CLI for build and Codex or another model for review.Inginerie★ 112
- code-reviewanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsReview code changes for security, performance, and correctness. Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps.OficialInginerie★ 32.8K
- requesting-code-reviewthiientv/godmodePrepares a focused code review request for a branch, commit, pull request, or substantial working-tree diff by defining the review boundary, contract, risk areas, evidence, and questions for an independent reviewer. Use before merge or when another agent needs to review an implementation. Not for processing feedback already received or for claiming runtime correctness.Inginerie★ 99
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te