ai-adversarial-loop
De la autor
Coordinate a multi-round debate between two agents until the code is clean. adversarial-reviewer (the critic) assumes everything is wrong; fixer implements fixes or disputes them with evidence. They exchange findings through a shared thread file, and each keeps its memory across rounds. Use as the orchestrator's review gate, or when the user asks for an adversarial review-and-fix loop on recent changes (e.g. "/ai-adversarial-loop", "have the critic and fixer go at checkpoint 3").
Instalare
npx skills add arcasilesgroup/ai-engineering --skill ai-adversarial-loop -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/ai-adversarial-loop/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 82
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- adversarial-reviewa5c-ai/babysitterFresh adversarial code review with binary PASS/FAIL verdicts, evidence citations, and anchoring bias prevention via fresh reviewer spawning.Inginerie★ 1.9K
- ds-review-loopaicodeking/deepseek-stackRuns an author and a fresh-context reviewer in a loop on the current change until both agree it is correct, for at most four rounds. Use before or after filing a PR, when the user says review loop, get it reviewed, or /ds-review-loop.Inginerie★ 166
- adjudicate-reviewpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowTurn an incoming set of findings — from an AI reviewer, a referee report, a code review, a linter, or a second model — into verified fixes, without letting a confident misread damage correct work. Every finding is a CANDIDATE until checked against the actual source. Use whenever you receive review comments, audit findings, or a critique you did not write yourself, especially when the reviewer is a model or when the volume is too large to check by feel.Inginerie★ 1.7K
- code-reviewmartinffx/atelierMulti-agent code review run as a debate. Critics raise findings in parallel, an Author defends the change, Critics concede or maintain, and a Judge rules on what stays contested. Findings are classified by kind and blocking, and handled durably when previously decided. Use `rq` to request a review of diffs (defaults to main branch), `rs` to respond to findings and record intentional non-fix decisions beside the relevant code. Triggers on "review this", "review my code", "code review", "check for bugs", "audit this", when examining PRs, pull requests, branches, or diffs. Always asks user before applying fixes or adding decision comments.Inginerie★ 50
- the-loopoxbshw/watch-skillThe user built or changed something visual — a UI, an animation, a game, a generated video — and wants it verified, or asks "why does my UI look wrong", "check that the fix actually worked", "does the animation glitch". Use this to record the running thing, critique the recording against plain-language pass criteria, and iterate until it passes with before/after proof.Design★ 551
- evaluate-findingstobihagemann/turboCritically assess external feedback (code reviews, AI reviewers, PR comments) and decide which suggestions to apply using adversarial verification. Use when the user asks to "evaluate findings", "assess review comments", "triage review feedback", "evaluate review output", or "filter false positives".Inginerie★ 417
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te