sequential-think
De la autor
Multi-step reasoning engine for complex analysis and systematic problem solving. Use when: (1) Complex debugging scenarios with multiple layers, (2) Architectural analysis and system design, (3) Problems requiring hypothesis testing and validation, (4) Multi-component failure investigation, (5) Performance bottleneck identification. Triggers: "--think", "--think-hard", "--ultrathink", "analyze step by step", "break down this problem", "systematic analysis". IMPORTANT: Do NOT use for simple single-step tasks.
Instalare
npx skills add Dianel555/DSkills --skill sequential-think -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/sequential-think/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
- Include scripturi pe care nu le-am verificatScăzut
De ce 76
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- sequential-thinkingsecondsky/claude-skillsSystematic step-by-step reasoning with revision and branching. Use for complex problems, multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or encountering unclear scope, alternative approaches needed, revision requirements.Design★ 236
- systematic-debuggingcbrock84/headcountFinds the root cause of a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior before proposing any fix. Use this whenever something is broken and the cause is not yet proven — a failing test, a production error, intermittent behavior, or a symptom that appeared after a change. Also use when a fix has been attempted and did not work, or when the same bug keeps coming back.Inginerie★ 2.1K
- thought-partnerjeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplaceCollaborative thinking partner for exploring ideas, challenges, and decisions. Use when the user needs to analyze ambiguity, test assumptions, or compare options. Trigger with "think through", "explore", "brainstorm", "help me figure out", or an open-ended strategy or priority question.Testare★ 2.9K
- thinkAgriciDaniel/claude-obsidianApply the Fable-derived 10-stage OBSERVE, OBSERVE, LISTEN, THINK, CONNECT, CONNECT, FEEL, ACCEPT, CREATE, GROW loop to consequential or ambiguous reasoning and decisions. Use for think this through, deep think, architecture review, postmortem, tradeoff analysis, or challenges to assumptions. This is a reasoning review, not a deterministic vault health check or repair workflow.Planificare★ 15.8K
- parallel-investigationrohitg00/skillkitCoordinates parallel investigation threads to simultaneously explore multiple hypotheses or root causes across different system areas. Use when debugging production incidents, slow API performance, multi-system integration failures, or complex bugs where the root cause is unclear and multiple plausible theories exist; when serial troubleshooting is too slow; or when multiple investigators can divide root-cause analysis work. Provides structured phases for problem decomposition, thread assignment, sync points with Continue/Pivot/Converge decisions, and final report synthesis.Finanțe★ 1.6K
- debug-systematictravisjneuman/.claudeSystematic 4-phase debugging methodology for complex, intermittent, or mysterious issues. Use when investigating bugs, race conditions, or unexplained failures.Inginerie★ 106
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te