biomarker-discovery
De la autor
Reason about biomarker discovery and validation in HCLS — classifying biomarker intent, choosing feature-selection and cross-validation strategies, avoiding leakage, and planning external replication. Use when the user asks to discover, develop, or validate a biomarker; select features from high-dimensional omics or clinical data; design a validation study; choose evaluation metrics; justify sample size; combine multi-omics signals; or assess clinical utility. Triggers include "discover a biomarker", "validate biomarker", "prognostic vs predictive", "feature selection", "LASSO vs elastic net", "nested cross-validation", "data leakage", "C-index", "time-dependent AUC", "decision curve analysis", "external validation cohort", "events per variable", "optimism-corrected", "multi-omics integration", "clinical utility of a biomarker", "is this biomarker ready".
Instalare
npx skills add awslabs/hcls-agent-skills --skill biomarker-discovery -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/biomarker-discovery/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 82
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- translational-researchawslabs/hcls-agent-skillsReason about translational research problems in HCLS — especially neurology and hypothesis validation. Use when the user asks to design a validation study, evaluate a target, qualify a biomarker, choose endpoints, critique a preclinical-to-clinical plan, pick a trial design (basket/umbrella/platform), plan multimodal data integration, or assess whether a hypothesis is ready to advance. Triggers include phrases like "validate target", "biomarker context of use", "bench to bedside", "T0/T1/T2/T3/T4", "proof of mechanism", "target engagement", "design a trial for", "preclinical model translates", "imaging-genetics", "is this ready for Phase 2", "mouse results to humans", "GWAS/eQTL/MR", "endpoint selection", "drug repurposing rationale", "fail fast".Știință★ 66
- imaging-study-designawslabs/hcls-agent-skillsReasoning skill for medical imaging study design and biomarker selection. Use when the user asks to plan an imaging study, choose a preprocessing strategy, select an imaging biomarker, design a radiomics pipeline, handle DICOM de-identification, plan longitudinal imaging analysis, or pick a registration target. Triggers include "imaging study", "preprocessing strategy", "DICOM de-identification", "imaging biomarker", "radiomics", "longitudinal imaging", "registration target", "MNI vs native space", "scanner harmonization", "ComBat", "IBSI", "multi-site imaging", "burned-in PHI", "test-retest reliability", "volumetric biomarker", "diffusion MRI", "perfusion imaging", "fMRI study design", "spectroscopy biomarker".Design★ 66
- ml-researcherawslabs/hcls-agent-skillsReason about ML experiment design for healthcare and life sciences data. Use when the user asks to design an ML study, choose a model for clinical/biomedical data, set up cross-validation, pick evaluation metrics, audit fairness, plan a regulatory submission, or critique an ML pipeline on EHR, medical imaging, genomics, molecules, or clinical text. Triggers include "design an ML experiment", "which model for this clinical data", "how should I split", "nested CV", "class imbalance", "AUROC vs AUPRC", "calibration", "decision curve", "net benefit", "TRIPOD+AI", "PROBAST", "CLAIM", "FDA SaMD", "PCCP", "GMLP", "site generalization", "temporal leakage", "scaffold split", "foundation model evaluation", "subgroup fairness", "is this model ready for deployment".DevOps★ 66
- drug-repurposingawslabs/hcls-agent-skillsReason about drug repurposing strategies in HCLS — choosing between target-based and phenotype-based approaches, evaluating mechanism-of-action overlap, querying drug-gene interaction databases, assessing clinical translatability, and ranking candidates by evidence strength. Use when the user asks to repurpose a drug, find approved drugs for a new indication, evaluate a repurposing candidate, query DGIdb or OpenTargets, assess drug-target interactions, design a repurposing study, rank repurposing evidence, or evaluate translatability of a candidate. Triggers include "drug repurposing", "repurpose", "repositioning", "new indication", "off-label use", "target-based repurposing", "phenotype-based repurposing", "CMap", "L1000", "DGIdb", "OpenTargets", "DrugBank", "ChEMBL", "mechanism of action overlap", "drug-gene interaction", "translatability", "existing safety data", "repurposing evidence hierarchy".Design★ 66
- pharmacoepidemiologyawslabs/hcls-agent-skillsReason about pharmacoepidemiologic study design for causal inference from real-world data — choosing active comparator new-user designs, emulating target trials, avoiding immortal time bias, handling time-varying confounding with marginal structural models, and selecting propensity score methods. Use when the user asks to design a drug safety or effectiveness study, choose between propensity score matching vs weighting vs stratification, emulate a target trial, handle immortal time bias, apply marginal structural models, assess unmeasured confounding with E-values, select an active comparator, define a new-user cohort, or evaluate a pharmacoepidemiology study design. Triggers include "active comparator", "new-user design", "target trial emulation", "immortal time bias", "propensity score matching", "IPTW", "marginal structural model", "confounding by indication", "E-value", "negative control outcomes", "quantitative bias analysis", "time-varying confounding", "prevalent user bias", "washout period", "landmarkDesign★ 66
- lamina-product-discoveryaryaniyaps/laminaFrame product problems and decide what to build. Use when establishing business context, aligning actors with conflicting goals, discovering or prioritizing features, defining traceable requirements, comparing consequential tradeoffs, or recording a product decision. Use lamina-ux for interaction details and lamina-product-behavior for authoritative runtime rules.Design★ 120
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te