text-classification
De la autor
Advises on setting up and validating LLM text classification: codebook, learning regime and model choice, prompts, validation against human coding (kappa, F1), hybrid review, measurement error, and reporting, plus a short resumable batch pattern with a rule-based baseline. Use to classify, code, or label text at scale; category discovery goes to topic-modeling.
Instalare
npx skills add scdenney/open-science-skills --skill text-classification -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/text-classification/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Fără descărcare: licența acestui skill (Personalizată sau neclară) nu ne permite să-i redistribuim fișierele. Comenzile de instalare le iau direct de pe GitHub.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 77
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- topic-modelingscdenney/open-science-skillsAdvises on setting up and validating topic models for survey and experimental text: discovery vs. measurement, STM/LDA/BERTopic choice, preprocessing, covariate formulas, choosing K across coherence, FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals, validating topics against human coding, robustness, and reporting. Coding against a fixed codebook goes to text-classification.Inginerie★ 69
- llm-calibration-logprobsscdenney/open-science-skillsReads model uncertainty from token log-probabilities. Covers collecting logprobs and aggregating multi-token labels, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration assessment with ECE, Brier scores, and reliability diagrams against human labels, responsible downstream use of confidence, and reproducibility archives. Use when the user asks about classifier confidence by item, logprobs, top-k tokens, calibration, ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams, or routing low-confidence cases to human review. Codebook and validation design go to text-classification.Design★ 69
- mltelagod/code-abyssMachine learning and LLM engineering judgment, distilled from a stronger model - invoke when DECIDING whether/how to use ML or an LLM for a task (prompt vs RAG vs fine-tune vs classical); working with training/eval data or labels; building or reviewing evals for models and LLM features; designing RAG, structured output, or agent pipelines; or diagnosing why a model/LLM feature underperforms. Method-selection ladder, data and leakage discipline, eval-as-spec rules, LLM-era craft, and a trap catalog.Planificare★ 243
- llm-evaluationwshobson/agentsImplement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.Testare★ 41.7K
- acl-experimentsbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when designing or auditing experiments for an ACL paper, covering tuned LLM baselines, multi-dataset and multilingual evaluation, statistical significance and variance, human evaluation with agreement reporting, contamination and prompt-sensitivity controls, ablations, and error-analysis expectations in NLP reviewing.Știință★ 1.3K
- nlpericrisco/rsc-harnessUse when choosing how to tokenize text or which transformer type fits an NLP task, when a tokenizer over-fragments non-English text or inflates token cost, when picking a language metric, or when classification, NER or summarization output looks wrong and it is unclear whether the tokenizer, the architecture or the metric is at fault. Covers subword tokenizers, encoder versus decoder versus encoder-decoder choice, sentence embeddings, and the metric families. NOT retrieval or vector search (that is `embeddings-search`), NOT the RAG loop (that is `rag`), NOT prompt wording (that is `prompt-engineering`), NOT training the network (that is `finetuning`).Planificare★ 272
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te