critical-thinking
De la autor
Critical thinking as philosophical practice. Covers the Socratic method (elenchus), argument identification and reconstruction, premise evaluation, fallacy detection (formal and informal), charitable interpretation (principle of charity), dialectical thinking (thesis-antithesis-synthesis), thought experiment methodology, philosophical writing and reading, intellectual virtues (humility, courage, empathy, honesty), Dewey's reflective thinking, and critical thinking applied to everyday reasoning. Use when analyzing arguments, practicing Socratic questioning, evaluating reasoning, or developing philosophical method.
Instalare
npx skills add Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator --skill critical-thinking -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/critical-thinking/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Fără descărcare: licența acestui skill (Personalizată sau neclară) nu ne permite să-i redistribuim fișierele. Comenzile de instalare le iau direct de pe GitHub.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 72
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- critical-argumentationTibsfox/gsd-skill-creatorPractical argument analysis and construction -- how to identify, evaluate, reconstruct, and build real arguments in natural language. Covers argument identification (premises, conclusions, intermediate steps), charity and steel-manning, argument mapping, the distinction between deductive validity and inductive strength, burden of proof, and the rhetorical context in which arguments operate. Use when the goal is to engage with real-world argument rather than to formalize it.Productivitate★ 71
- scientific-critical-thinkingK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skillsEvaluates scientific claims and evidence quality. Applies to experimental design validity, biases and confounders, statistical interpretation, evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), and teaching critical analysis. Supports evidence appraisal and identifying flaws; formal peer review writing belongs to peer-review.Știință★ 54.5K
- critical-readingTibsfox/gsd-skill-creatorAnalytical evaluation of texts for argument quality, author purpose, bias, credibility, and rhetorical strategy. Covers the distinction between comprehension and critique, argument analysis (claims, evidence, reasoning, warrants), rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos), bias identification (selection bias, confirmation bias, loaded language, omission), source credibility evaluation (CRAAP test, lateral reading), propaganda techniques, media literacy, and multi-text synthesis. Use when evaluating arguments, identifying bias, assessing source reliability, analyzing rhetoric, or synthesizing across multiple texts on the same topic.Testare★ 71
- critical-perspectiveinfranodus/skillsEngage in critical thinking by questioning assumptions, exploring alternative perspectives, and uncovering latent topics in conversations. Use when discussions could benefit from deeper exploration, when identifying blind spots, or when broadening understanding through respectful challenge and curiosity-driven inquiry.Altele★ 122
- literary-analysisTibsfox/gsd-skill-creatorInterpretive methods for analyzing literary texts including fiction, poetry, drama, and creative nonfiction. Covers narrative elements (character, plot, setting, point of view, theme), literary devices (symbolism, imagery, irony, foreshadowing, allusion), critical lenses (formalist, reader-response, historical, feminist, postcolonial, psychoanalytic, Marxist), close reading of prose and poetry, intertextuality and influence, and the relationship between form and meaning. Use when interpreting literary texts, analyzing author craft, applying critical lenses, discussing theme and symbolism, or exploring how literary form creates meaning.Redactare★ 71
- scientific-thinkingAgents365-ai/365-skillsUse when interpreting research findings, evaluating scientific evidence, analyzing mechanisms, comparing competing hypotheses, designing experiments, or constructing scientific arguments.Știință★ 90
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te