fable-operator
De la autor
Use when a substantive request needs verified, calibrated reasoning — analysis, diagnosis, review, advice, or a draft the user will act on — even when rigor is not asked for, and most of all when being wrong is expensive or irreversible. NOT casual chat (rigor theater), NOT the SDD gates `verify`, `debug`, `review`; this is the discipline beneath them.
Instalare
npx skills add ericrisco/rsc-harness --skill fable-operator -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/fable-operator/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 85
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- fable-scope-disciplineDizzyMii/fable-skillsUse when implementing any change in existing code — when tempted to clean up nearby code, add unrequested validation or options, fix something "arguably in scope", or when the diff is growing past what was asked.Inginerie★ 56
- fable-prove-itDizzyMii/fable-skillsUse before claiming anything works, is fixed, is done, or passes; before status updates on changes you haven't run; before agreeing with someone else's claim about your work; and before state-changing commands like restarts, deletes, or config edits.Redactare★ 56
- fable-advisorfcakyon/claude-codex-settingsThis skill should be used when the user asks for a "Fable second opinion", wants to "check a plan before committing", needs another view after repeated failures, or explicitly invokes "fable-advisor".Planificare★ 1.2K
- verifying-claimsoaustegard/claude-skillsCheck that a document's claims about code are actually true by reading the prose, the code, and the tests and reporting (or fixing) where they disagree. Use whenever the user wants to verify a README, guide, spec, or docstring still matches the code; whenever they mention documentation drift, doc-code sync, "is this still accurate", stale docs, or keeping docs/tests/code consistent; before publishing or merging a docs change; or as a periodic doc-accuracy sweep. The agent reads the prose's meaning directly — there is no claim-comment DSL to maintain. Pairs with TDD — the test suite is the deterministic behavioral gate, this skill is the semantic prose-vs-reality review.Testare★ 154
- fable-judgeSahir619/fable-methodAdversarial verification of finished work. Treats any "done" as a set of claims, then re-runs the claimed verifications, diffs what actually changed, detects weakened tests and false completion claims, and delivers an evidence-based verdict (VERIFIED / VERIFIED WITH CAVEATS / REFUTED). Use after any agent or model claims work is complete - "/fable-judge", "judge this work", "verify what it did", "did that actually work?". Also runs the fable-method trap suite against a skill or model via "/fable-judge suite TARGET".Testare★ 2.3K
- receiving-code-reviewcoco-research/cocoUse when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementationInginerie★ 787
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te