screenshot-critique
De la autor
Use the unprimed sub agent as a second set of eyes before accepting visual work — MANDATORY before declaring any user-reported visual bug fixed or claiming a visual change verified; primed eyes pass defects fresh eyes catch.
Instalare
npx skills add dzhng/skills --skill screenshot-critique -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/screenshot-critique/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
- Include scripturi pe care nu le-am verificatScăzut
De ce 82
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- compare-screenshotsdzhng/skillsCompare screenshots against the intended design, distinguishing approved references from historical baselines. Use for iterative implementation matching, before/after visual review, objective image telemetry, or checking a lone capture for flat, empty, or badly framed content.Design★ 1.4K
- prismOutlineDriven/outline-driven-developmentUse when one reviewer angle is insufficient or the user suspects a direction is tunnel-visioned or inherited its framing. Modes: artifact, direction. Not for source or remote-system changes.Altele★ 55
- agent-first-screenshotsDevin-AXIS/iPolloWorkAgent-first screenshots — an agent drives the real app via CDP and produces clean, defect-free product screenshots (newsletters, landing pages, social, decks, PR). Dual-channel verification (DOM + pixels + vision) in a capture loop. Use for any "take/redo screenshots of the app" task.Productivitate★ 7.3K
- bmad-reviewalvin-reyes/better-agentic-ideRuns one or more installed review lenses — adversarial critique, edge cases, verification gaps, structure, prose — and reports triaged findings. Use when, and only when, the user asks you to review a diff, a pull request, or an artifact — code or documents, one or many — and actually says "review"; an explicit skill:bmad-review directive from another skill counts as that ask. A request to act on feedback from an earlier review is a change, not a review. Never invoke this uninvited, including on edits you just made.Inginerie★ 85
- second-opinionarcasilesgroup/ai-engineeringGet an independent review of code you just wrote by spawning a fresh reviewer instance — a separate one-shot agent session with read-only tools that cannot see your reasoning. Use this immediately after finishing ANY implementation — a feature, a bugfix, a refactor, a migration, a schema change — before you tell the user the work is done. Also use whenever the user says "review this", "double-check that", "get a second opinion", "have another agent look at it", or asks whether an implementation is actually correct. Especially worth it when the change touches money, auth, permissions, migrations, or data deletion, or when you noticed yourself feeling uncertain while writing it.Redactare★ 62
- receiving-critical-reviewK-Dense-AI/science-superpowersUse when receiving critical feedback on an analysis or manuscript, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or methodologically questionable - requires verification, not performative agreement or blind changesInginerie★ 363
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te