analiza aiqbench
This research investigates the limitations of Large Language Models in zero-shot coordination tasks, identifying weak reasoning about partner beliefs as a primary failure mode even in simplified environments. The authors propose Coordination-friendly definitions (CFDs) that can be automatically discovered to enable robust multi-agent collaboration without specialized scaffolding. This work advances the understanding of agent interaction dynamics and offers a practical framework for improving LLM-based multi-agent systems.
Zero-Shot Coordination among LLM Agents
arXiv:2611.06409v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study zero-shot coordination (ZSC), where independently developed agents must coordinate at test time. While ZSC has been well studied in the RL literature, far less is known about the performance of LLM agents despite their increasing deployment in such settings. Existing work on LLM coordination often relies on specialised scaffolding that independently developed agents are unlikely to share in practice. Moreover, evaluations on complex environments (e.g., Hanabi) make it difficult to pinpoint the sources of coordination failure. In contrast, we focus on simple, general-purpose scaffolds in minimal environments designed to isolate specific coordination challenges. Our results show that even in these controlled settings, frontier LLM agents struggle to coordinate, largely due to limited understanding of the coordination problem and weak reasoning about their partner's beliefs. While LLMs introduce semantic information as an additional axis for coordination, they nonetheless fail to exploit this structure effectively. Towards this, we propose Coordination-friendly definitions (CFDs) as a principled approach for enabling robust coordination among LLM agents. Finally, we show that CFDs can be discovered automatically, removing the need for manual engineering. Code is available at https://github.com/ahayler/zsc-llm-agents.
Abstract:We study zero-shot coordination (ZSC), where independently developed agents must coordinate at test time. While ZSC has been well studied in the RL literature, far less is known about the performance of LLM agents despite their increasing deployment in such settings. Existing work on LLM coordination often relies on specialised scaffolding that independently developed agents are unlikely to share in practice. Moreover, evaluations on complex environments (e.g., Hanabi) make it difficult to pinpoint the sources of coordination failure. In contrast, we focus on simple, general-purpose scaffolds in minimal environments designed to isolate specific coordination challenges. Our results show that even in these controlled settings, frontier LLM agents struggle to coordinate, largely due to limited understanding of the coordination problem and weak reasoning about their partner's beliefs. While LLMs introduce semantic information as an additional axis for coordination, they nonetheless fail to exploit this structure effectively. Towards this, we propose Coordination-friendly definitions (CFDs) as a principled approach for enabling robust coordination among LLM agents. Finally, we show that CFDs can be discovered automatically, removing the need for manual engineering. Code is available at this https URL.
NeurIPS 2026 Poster. ICLR 26 MALGAI Workshop Oral. The first two authors contributed equally
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2611.06409 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2611.06409v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.06409 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 296 cuvinte
