Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This research reveals a critical shift in web data quality for AI training, demonstrating that over 70% of frequent questions are now templated rather than genuine human queries. By distinguishing between manufactured content and authentic user intent using logistic models, the study warns against relying on raw question frequency as a proxy for demand or human curiosity. These findings have direct implications for building robust retrieval benchmarks and QA datasets that avoid contamination from algorithmically generated noise.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, Fortune, LessWrong, Effective Altruism Forum
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

You Can Tell Who's Asking: What the Web's Questions Are Made Of, and Where They Come From

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.24106v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Questions scraped from the web are used across academia and industry as a proxy for what people want to know. Across QA training data, retrieval benchmarks, and content strategy, questions on a page are assumed to reflect human intent. We test this assumption at scale by extracting 13.4B question occurrences across 110 FineWeb snapshots (2013-2025), and report three findings. First, you can tell who is asking: provenance (the host/page of questions) leaves a signal in question form, and a logistic model can separate genuine user questions from templated/manufactured ones at AUC 0.725 via length and surrounding context rather than question type, though only 0.554 against commerce FAQ writing. Second, question frequency does not measure demand: the most-frequent questions are boilerplate/templated (over 70% of the top thousand), so occurrence counts measure how often a string was published and not how often it was asked. Third, over twelve years the genuine share of occurrences fell by 79% (42-56% after controlling for crawl composition), with question length and context decreasing. We present the first diachronic, occurrence-level measurement of web question provenance, and find the crawlable web's questions have shifted from being asked by humans toward manufactured for machines to read.

Abstract:Questions scraped from the web are used across academia and industry as a proxy for what people want to know. Across QA training data, retrieval benchmarks, and content strategy, questions on a page are assumed to reflect human intent. We test this assumption at scale by extracting 13.4B question occurrences across 110 FineWeb snapshots (2013-2025), and report three findings. First, you can tell who is asking: provenance (the host/page of questions) leaves a signal in question form, and a logistic model can separate genuine user questions from templated/manufactured ones at AUC 0.725 via length and surrounding context rather than question type, though only 0.554 against commerce FAQ writing. Second, question frequency does not measure demand: the most-frequent questions are boilerplate/templated (over 70% of the top thousand), so occurrence counts measure how often a string was published and not how often it was asked. Third, over twelve years the genuine share of occurrences fell by 79% (42-56% after controlling for crawl composition), with question length and context decreasing. We present the first diachronic, occurrence-level measurement of web question provenance, and find the crawlable web's questions have shifted from being asked by humans toward manufactured for machines to read.

Accepted to the 13th Web as Corpus Workshop (WaC-13) at EMNLP 2026. 14 pages, 4 figures. Code and data: this https URL

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

I.2.7; H.3.1; H.3.3

arXiv:2609.24106 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.24106v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24106 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 317 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe