Why Do Conventional World Models Fail to Learn Cellular Automata?

arXiv:2609.39604v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Although conventional world models - auto-regressive or diffusion models based on transformers or convolutional networks - may learn surface statistics of world dynamics, can they learn the exact world dynamics from its observed history? Leveraging cellular automata as a simple testbed, we find the answer to be no in many cases. Conventional architectures predict most pixels correctly yet rarely complete a rollout: a CNN predicts 96.3% of cells but completes 18.9% of rollouts; a joint diffusion model completes none. We trace the gap to three failure modes of these world models - namely, they fail to exactly capture spatial locality, temporal locality or temporal stability. Simple changes repair each: (1) for spatial locality, two-dimensional rotary positions lift a transformer from 39.1% to 100% on the Game of Life; (2) for temporal locality, handing each token its cell's previous-frame neighbourhood lifts the same transformer from 25.8% to 99.9% on unseen rules; (3) for temporal stability, causal freezing lifts the same diffusion weights from 42.2% to 99.9%. None of the three changes touches the architectural backbone; each only modifies the information flow within it. We also compare joint and ordered sampling on billiards and, in an exploratory study, on a simulated Burgers equation.

Title:Why Do Conventional World Models Fail to Learn Cellular Automata?

Abstract:Although conventional world models - auto-regressive or diffusion models based on transformers or convolutional networks - may learn surface statistics of world dynamics, can they learn the exact world dynamics from its observed history? Leveraging cellular automata as a simple testbed, we find the answer to be no in many cases. Conventional architectures predict most pixels correctly yet rarely complete a rollout: a CNN predicts 96.3% of cells but completes 18.9% of rollouts; a joint diffusion model completes none. We trace the gap to three failure modes of these world models - namely, they fail to exactly capture spatial locality, temporal locality or temporal stability. Simple changes repair each: (1) for spatial locality, two-dimensional rotary positions lift a transformer from 39.1% to 100% on the Game of Life; (2) for temporal locality, handing each token its cell's previous-frame neighbourhood lifts the same transformer from 25.8% to 99.9% on unseen rules; (3) for temporal stability, causal freezing lifts the same diffusion weights from 42.2% to 99.9%. None of the three changes touches the architectural backbone; each only modifies the information flow within it. We also compare joint and ordered sampling on billiards and, in an exploratory study, on a simulated Burgers equation.

35 pages, 18 figures. Code and reproduction materials: this https URL

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.39604 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.39604v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.39604 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

analiza aiqbench

Why Do Conventional World Models Fail to Learn Cellular Automata?

Subiecte conexe