analiza aiqbench
This paper addresses the critical issue of unstable robot personas caused by underspecified prompt design in LLM-based human-robot interaction. By proposing a structured eight-component template, it offers researchers a practical framework to enforce capability boundaries and mitigate safety risks like hallucinations or deception. The work reframes prompt engineering not as a minor technical detail but as a necessary socio-technical governance problem for reliable AI agents.
Why did My Robot Just Change Personality? Prompting Guidelines for a Grounded Robot Persona in LLM-Based HRI
arXiv:2608.26182v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for verbal interaction in social robots, yet prompt design in human-robot interaction (HRI) remains underspecified. As a result, robots may present hallucinated capabilities, unclear behavioural boundaries, and misleading personas. This paper develops a framework for prompt design in LLM-based robots and introduces a structured prompt template comprising eight functional components through which robot behaviour can be specified, bounded, and adapted. The framework is grounded in a review of prior LLM-based HRI work and complemented by survey and discussion data from HRI experts gathered at the Robo-Identity workshop at IEEE RO-MAN 2025 (N=27). The qualitative findings highlight limited legibility of robot personality, the need for user adaptation, and strong ethical concerns about safety, deception, and governance. Based on these findings, we present prompting guidelines accompanied by proof-of-concept template as a structured design and reporting aid for HRI research. We argue that prompt design should be treated as a socio-technical problem rather than a minor implementation detail, requiring explicit capability boundaries, transparent behavioural assumptions, and context-sensitive safeguards to support reliable and interpretable HRI.
Title:Why did My Robot Just Change Personality? Prompting Guidelines for a Grounded Robot Persona in LLM-Based HRI
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for verbal interaction in social robots, yet prompt design in human-robot interaction (HRI) remains underspecified. As a result, robots may present hallucinated capabilities, unclear behavioural boundaries, and misleading personas. This paper develops a framework for prompt design in LLM-based robots and introduces a structured prompt template comprising eight functional components through which robot behaviour can be specified, bounded, and adapted. The framework is grounded in a review of prior LLM-based HRI work and complemented by survey and discussion data from HRI experts gathered at the Robo-Identity workshop at IEEE RO-MAN 2025 (N=27). The qualitative findings highlight limited legibility of robot personality, the need for user adaptation, and strong ethical concerns about safety, deception, and governance. Based on these findings, we present prompting guidelines accompanied by proof-of-concept template as a structured design and reporting aid for HRI research. We argue that prompt design should be treated as a socio-technical problem rather than a minor implementation detail, requiring explicit capability boundaries, transparent behavioural assumptions, and context-sensitive safeguards to support reliable and interpretable HRI.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2608.26182 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.26182v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26182 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 294 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
A Red Line and Oversight Framework for Government AI Contracts
AI Alignment Forum · 18 iul. 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · 25 sept. 2026

Whack-a-drone
The Verge · 24 iul. 2026

Skydio CEO Adam Bry on why Silicon Valley shouldn’t draw red lines for drone use
The Verge · 15 iun. 2026