Why Convolution Still Matters: Evaluating Inductive Biases in Cryospheric Image Classification

arXiv:2610.04073v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in attention-based deep learning have motivated their adoption for remote sensing image classification; however, their benefits for cryospheric imagery, where surface states are dominated by fine-grained textures and class imbalance, remain unclear. In this work, we revisit a benchmark Greenland Ice Sheet image dataset, previously shown to favor convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to examine whether modern attention-based and hybrid architectures improve class-wise reliability. We conduct a controlled comparison between a classical CNN (AlexNet), a modern CNN (ConvNeXt-Tiny), a pure attention-based model (Swin-Tiny), and a hybrid convolution-attention model (CoAtNet-0) under identical training and evaluation protocols. Results show that AlexNet achieves the highest accuracy and the strongest balanced performance as measured by macro-averaged F1, while ConvNeXt-Tiny exhibits the highest macro-averaged AUC, indicating strong class separability but less consistent final decision quality. Class-wise analysis reveals that hybrid architectures improve recall for rare and structurally distinct surface classes, whereas convolutional models remain more reliable for texture-dominated categories. These findings highlight the importance of aligning architectural inductive bias with cryospheric data characteristics and suggest that increased model complexity does not necessarily translate to improved reliability for ice-sheet surface classification.

Abstract:Recent advances in attention-based deep learning have motivated their adoption for remote sensing image classification; however, their benefits for cryospheric imagery, where surface states are dominated by fine-grained textures and class imbalance, remain unclear. In this work, we revisit a benchmark Greenland Ice Sheet image dataset, previously shown to favor convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to examine whether modern attention-based and hybrid architectures improve class-wise reliability. We conduct a controlled comparison between a classical CNN (AlexNet), a modern CNN (ConvNeXt-Tiny), a pure attention-based model (Swin-Tiny), and a hybrid convolution-attention model (CoAtNet-0) under identical training and evaluation protocols. Results show that AlexNet achieves the highest accuracy and the strongest balanced performance as measured by macro-averaged F1, while ConvNeXt-Tiny exhibits the highest macro-averaged AUC, indicating strong class separability but less consistent final decision quality. Class-wise analysis reveals that hybrid architectures improve recall for rare and structurally distinct surface classes, whereas convolutional models remain more reliable for texture-dominated categories. These findings highlight the importance of aligning architectural inductive bias with cryospheric data characteristics and suggest that increased model complexity does not necessarily translate to improved reliability for ice-sheet surface classification.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.04073 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.04073v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04073 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

analiza aiqbench

Why Convolution Still Matters: Evaluating Inductive Biases in Cryospheric Image Classification

Subiecte conexe