analiza aiqbench
This study investigates how Large Language Models align with distinct human humor clusters using data from the Japanese game Oogiri, revealing that LLMs can mimic specific user groups via persona prompting. By applying Bradley-Terry-Luce models to voting logs, the research provides a quantitative framework for understanding heterogeneity in AI-generated comedic preferences and their cultural biases. The findings offer critical insights into aligning generative models with diverse human values without relying on generic training objectives.
Who Laughs with Whom? Disentangling Influential Factors in Humor Preferences across User Clusters and LLMs
arXiv:2601.03103v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Humor preferences vary widely across individuals and cultures, complicating the evaluation of humor using large language models (LLMs). In this study, we model heterogeneity in humor preferences in Oogiri, a Japanese creative response game, by clustering users with voting logs and estimating cluster-specific weights over interpretable preference factors using Bradley-Terry-Luce models. We elicit preference judgments from LLMs by prompting them to select the funnier response and found that user clusters exhibit distinct preference patterns and that the LLM results can resemble those of particular clusters. Finally, we demonstrate that, by persona prompting, LLM preferences can be directed toward a specific cluster. The scripts for data collection and analysis are publicly available to support reproducibility.
Title:Who Laughs with Whom? Disentangling Influential Factors in Humor Preferences across User Clusters and LLMs
Abstract:Humor preferences vary widely across individuals and cultures, complicating the evaluation of humor using large language models (LLMs). In this study, we model heterogeneity in humor preferences in Oogiri, a Japanese creative response game, by clustering users with voting logs and estimating cluster-specific weights over interpretable preference factors using Bradley-Terry-Luce models. We elicit preference judgments from LLMs by prompting them to select the funnier response and found that user clusters exhibit distinct preference patterns and that the LLM results can resemble those of particular clusters. Finally, we demonstrate that, by persona prompting, LLM preferences can be directed toward a specific cluster. The scripts for data collection and analysis are publicly available to support reproducibility.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2601.03103 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2601.03103v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.03103 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 225 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

How funny are the frontier AI models?
LessWrong · 6 oct. 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · 3 aug. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · 11 iul. 2026