Which CS1 Students Will Fail? Identifying Digital Markers from Learning Analytics in Computer Systems and Architecture Using Weighted Academic Momentum and Interaction Logs

Important: e-prints posted on arXiv are not peer-reviewed by arXiv; they should not be relied upon without context to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information without consulting multiple experts in the field.

Title:Which CS1 Students Will Fail? Identifying Digital Markers from Learning Analytics in Computer Systems and Architecture Using Weighted Academic Momentum and Interaction Logs

Abstract:Digital learning platforms generate rich behavioural traces (digital markers) that offer the potential to identify struggling students early. This paper investigates whether a combination of traditional and digital markers can predict failure in a first-year CS1 course (Computer Systems and Architecture) with sufficient recall to enable timely intervention. Using data from four cohorts (2017-2021, N=284) at a large public university in sub-Saharan Africa, we conducted a mixed-methods stakeholder elicitation to identify ten candidate factors. These were operationalised into a comprehensive feature set spanning demographics, self-reported surveys, Moodle interaction logs, and continuous assessment scores. A systematic ablation study using logistic regression with 5-fold cross-validation and SMOTE+ENN resampling revealed that the most predictive feature subset was Base + Demo + LMS: weighted academic momentum (M = 0.1Q1 + 0.15Q2 + 0.2Q3 + 0.55T1), basic demographics (gender, sponsorship, COVID-19 cohort), and a binary indicator of any LMS activity. On a held-out test set, logistic regression achieved 74.7% accuracy, 0.742 macro F1, and an AUC of 0.800. At the default threshold of 0.5, the model identified 87% of failing students (recall = 0.87) with a 41% false positive rate. SHAP analysis confirmed that weighted academic momentum is the strongest predictor, followed by its interaction with LMS engagement. These results demonstrate that simple digital markers can power a practical early-warning system by the fifth week of the semester. Our main contributions are: (1) a multi-source dataset and a stakeholder-guided methodology; (2) an ablation study quantifying feature group contributions; and (3) an interpretable, high-recall model ready for deployment.

Computers and Society (cs.CY); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

K.3.2; H.3.5; I.2.6

arXiv:2608.16914 [cs.CY]

(or arXiv:2608.16914v1 [cs.CY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16914 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.