analiza aiqbench
This research investigates how vision-language models prioritize linguistic cues over visual evidence, proposing a diagnostic framework to trace bias propagation across four distinct inference stages. By analyzing the interplay between linguistic priors and cross-modal coverage, the study aims to resolve conflicting findings in prior literature regarding the mechanisms of language bias in black-box systems.
When Words Speak Louder than Images: Towards Understanding Language Bias in Vision-Language Models
arXiv:2609.35272v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite substantial progress across downstream applications, vision-language models (VLMs) remain susceptible to language bias, often prioritizing linguistic cues over visual evidence and consequently producing incorrect predictions. Prior studies have proposed various approaches to understanding and mitigating language bias in VLMs, yet their findings often conflict due to the difficulty of tracing how language bias propagates within black-box VLMs. Building on the word completion task, we trace how language bias propagates through VLM inference by (1) proposing a diagnostic framework that decomposes the inference process into four distinct yet interdependent stages to trace the propagation of language bias; and (2) examining how two key factors underlying language bias, i.e., linguistic priors and cross-modal coverage, evolve across these stages and ultimately give rise to incorrect predictions. The linguistic prior captures the strength of statistical bias induced by the language model component of a VLM and represents the origin of language bias, whereas cross-modal coverage measures the extent to which linguistic cues cover the visual content. By decomposing inference into four stages and characterizing the interplay between linguistic priors and cross-modal coverage across these stages, we propose a systematic framework for tracing the propagation of language bias throughout the inference process; and uncover the underlying mechanism of language bias by revealing the interplay between linguistic priors and cross-modal coverage.
Abstract:Despite substantial progress across downstream applications, vision-language models (VLMs) remain susceptible to language bias, often prioritizing linguistic cues over visual evidence and consequently producing incorrect predictions. Prior studies have proposed various approaches to understanding and mitigating language bias in VLMs, yet their findings often conflict due to the difficulty of tracing how language bias propagates within black-box VLMs. Building on the word completion task, we trace how language bias propagates through VLM inference by (1) proposing a diagnostic framework that decomposes the inference process into four distinct yet interdependent stages to trace the propagation of language bias; and (2) examining how two key factors underlying language bias, i.e., linguistic priors and cross-modal coverage, evolve across these stages and ultimately give rise to incorrect predictions. The linguistic prior captures the strength of statistical bias induced by the language model component of a VLM and represents the origin of language bias, whereas cross-modal coverage measures the extent to which linguistic cues cover the visual content. By decomposing inference into four stages and characterizing the interplay between linguistic priors and cross-modal coverage across these stages, we propose a systematic framework for tracing the propagation of language bias throughout the inference process; and uncover the underlying mechanism of language bias by revealing the interplay between linguistic priors and cross-modal coverage.
22 pages, 9 figures. Preprint
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.35272 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.35272v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35272 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 316 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Six Principles of Voice Design: Designing for the Ear and Encoding It into Agent Script
Salesforce Blog · 8 oct. 2026

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · 8 iun. 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · 17 oct. 2026

Podcast with Harry Kumar, Co-founder, Director & CCO of Moth Quantum
Quantum Computing Report · 9 oct. 2026