analiza aiqbench
This study applies natural language processing techniques, specifically temporally aligned word embeddings, to track the long-term evolution of semantic polarization on Reddit. By quantifying how political concepts diverge in meaning over time rather than just at a single snapshot, it offers a scalable framework for analyzing ideological shifts without relying solely on sentiment analysis or affective dimensions.
When Words Divide: Diachronic Ideological Polarization in Political Discourse on Social Media
arXiv:2608.01176v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Political polarization has become a defining feature of online discourse, yet its long-term evolution remains poorly understood. We present a longitudinal analysis of ideological polarization in Reddit discussions by measuring semantic differences in the language used by opposing political communities. We construct temporally aligned community-specific word embeddings and quantify ideological polarization as the semantic divergence of political concepts over time. Our analysis shows that ideological polarization has increased substantially during the study period, both at the concept- and topic-level. Unlike prior computational work, which has largely focused on cross-sectional analyses or affective dimensions of polarization at a single point at time, our approach captures the evolution of ideological differences in semantic framing. The proposed framework provides a scalable method for studying the temporal dynamics of ideological polarization in large-scale social media discourse.
Abstract:Political polarization has become a defining feature of online discourse, yet its long-term evolution remains poorly understood. We present a longitudinal analysis of ideological polarization in Reddit discussions by measuring semantic differences in the language used by opposing political communities. We construct temporally aligned community-specific word embeddings and quantify ideological polarization as the semantic divergence of political concepts over time. Our analysis shows that ideological polarization has increased substantially during the study period, both at the concept- and topic-level. Unlike prior computational work, which has largely focused on cross-sectional analyses or affective dimensions of polarization at a single point at time, our approach captures the evolution of ideological differences in semantic framing. The proposed framework provides a scalable method for studying the temporal dynamics of ideological polarization in large-scale social media discourse.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)
arXiv:2608.01176 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.01176v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.01176 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 232 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
ControBench: An Interaction-Aware Benchmark for Controversial Discourse Analysis on Social Networks
arXiv · 14 oct. 2026
Against Export Controls (and China Threat Models)
LessWrong · 24 sept. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026

The Five Realities of Existence, by Isaac Megbolugbe
promptnewsonline.com · 6 sept. 2026