analiza aiqbench
This study reveals a critical coupling between the preconditioning exponent and the learning rate in adaptive optimizers, demonstrating that negative exponents emerge as an optimal regime specifically for high step-sizes to mitigate spurious feature reliance. The findings highlight a fundamental conflict where source-domain validation metrics select different hyperparameter settings than those required for robust cross-environment generalization. For practitioners deploying adaptive methods in non-stationary environments, this work provides essential guidance on balancing convergence speed with distributional robustness through joint tuning of these parameters.
When the Preconditioning Exponent Turns Negative: Learning-Rate Coupling and Cross-Environment Generalization
arXiv:2609.30271v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adaptive optimizers are commonly parameterized by a fixed power of the second-moment estimate. Existing partially adaptive methods study exponents between momentum-like updates and the standard Adam square root, while the interaction between this exponent and the global learning rate is less understood. We perform a controlled cross-environment study using a paired four-environment classification problem with stable sparse features, environment-dependent spurious sparse features, dense features, and high-dimensional noise. Across \NumRuns{} source-training runs covering 21 preconditioning exponents $p\in[-0.5,0.5]$ and five learning rates $\eta\in[10^{-4},10^{-2}]$, we find that the exponent maximizing cross-environment accuracy decreases almost linearly with $\log_{10}\eta$. The fitted slopes range from $-0.270$ to $-0.300$, with $R^2$ between $0.972$ and $0.996$. At $\eta=10^{-2}$, source-validation selection still prefers positive exponents in all four environments, whereas cross-environment and worst-environment criteria prefer negative exponents. Checkpoint decomposition shows that lower $p$ reduces the learned spurious-to-stable and noise-to-stable weight ratios; under reversed correlation, it also reduces the magnitude of the harmful spurious margin. Negative $p$ is therefore not a universally optimal setting. It is a high-step-size allocation regime produced by the joint action of learning rate and preconditioning. The study also exposes a model-selection conflict: source-domain validation systematically selects a different preconditioning regime from the one that maximizes robustness to environmental change. The results are a single-seed, finite-budget mechanism study rather than a broad benchmark claim.
Abstract:Adaptive optimizers are commonly parameterized by a fixed power of the second-moment estimate. Existing partially adaptive methods study exponents between momentum-like updates and the standard Adam square root, while the interaction between this exponent and the global learning rate is less understood. We perform a controlled cross-environment study using a paired four-environment classification problem with stable sparse features, environment-dependent spurious sparse features, dense features, and high-dimensional noise. Across \NumRuns{} source-training runs covering 21 preconditioning exponents $p\in[-0.5,0.5]$ and five learning rates $\eta\in[10^{-4},10^{-2}]$, we find that the exponent maximizing cross-environment accuracy decreases almost linearly with $\log_{10}\eta$. The fitted slopes range from $-0.270$ to $-0.300$, with $R^2$ between $0.972$ and $0.996$. At $\eta=10^{-2}$, source-validation selection still prefers positive exponents in all four environments, whereas cross-environment and worst-environment criteria prefer negative exponents. Checkpoint decomposition shows that lower $p$ reduces the learned spurious-to-stable and noise-to-stable weight ratios; under reversed correlation, it also reduces the magnitude of the harmful spurious margin. Negative $p$ is therefore not a universally optimal setting. It is a high-step-size allocation regime produced by the joint action of learning rate and preconditioning. The study also exposes a model-selection conflict: source-domain validation systematically selects a different preconditioning regime from the one that maximizes robustness to environmental change. The results are a single-seed, finite-budget mechanism study rather than a broad benchmark claim.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.30271 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.30271v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30271 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 310 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Import AI 470: No rights for machines; automating environment generation with SPADE; and building better GPU kernels with Hawkeye
Import AI · 24 aug. 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 aug. 2026

Challenge: Hand coding weights for efficient sequence memorisation
AI Alignment Forum · 23 iul. 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · 15 iun. 2026