analiza aiqbench
This research addresses a critical failure mode in multimodal LLMs where they cannot extract text embedded in coarse image structures, a capability humans possess through "squinting." The authors introduce SquintBench and SquintCtrl to diagnose this deficiency, revealing that spatial selection bottlenecks hinder glyph recognition even when visual evidence exists. Their proposed Squint OPSD method significantly improves reading accuracy by leveraging privileged context during training without requiring auxiliary views at inference time.
When MLLMs miss what humans read: diagnosing and learning to read squint text
arXiv:2610.13465v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal LLMs can fail to read text embedded in an image's coarse structure (text a human recovers by squinting) and report that no text is present. We name this class Squint Text and study it as a recognition deficiency, motivated by cases from a production moderation pipeline. We introduce SquintBench, comprising 1076 production-derived moderation images, and SquintCtrl, a controlled synthetic suite for mechanism diagnosis. Frozen-weight analysis shows that hidden text leaves a coarse signal while glyph identity is weakly represented; identity becomes substantially more accessible when the correct spatial regions are supplied, implicating spatial selection as a major bottleneck. Suppressing high-frequency content also improves reading at a fixed visual-token budget, while visual token count may also contribute. These findings motivate Squint OPSD: a frozen teacher receives a downscaled view and the ground-truth transcription as privileged context, and its token-level distributions supervise a student along on-policy trajectories. At inference, the student reads the original image alone. Squint OPSD reaches 88.61 ANLS on SquintBench, versus 26.50 for the unadapted backbone, 24.44 for the best general-purpose model on the original view, and 68.60 at best for an off-the-shelf model under a downscaled view. These results substantially narrow the gap between available visual evidence and its generated read-out without auxiliary views at inference.
Abstract:Multimodal LLMs can fail to read text embedded in an image's coarse structure (text a human recovers by squinting) and report that no text is present. We name this class Squint Text and study it as a recognition deficiency, motivated by cases from a production moderation pipeline. We introduce SquintBench, comprising 1076 production-derived moderation images, and SquintCtrl, a controlled synthetic suite for mechanism diagnosis. Frozen-weight analysis shows that hidden text leaves a coarse signal while glyph identity is weakly represented; identity becomes substantially more accessible when the correct spatial regions are supplied, implicating spatial selection as a major bottleneck. Suppressing high-frequency content also improves reading at a fixed visual-token budget, while visual token count may also contribute. These findings motivate Squint OPSD: a frozen teacher receives a downscaled view and the ground-truth transcription as privileged context, and its token-level distributions supervise a student along on-policy trajectories. At inference, the student reads the original image alone. Squint OPSD reaches 88.61 ANLS on SquintBench, versus 26.50 for the unadapted backbone, 24.44 for the best general-purpose model on the original view, and 68.60 at best for an off-the-shelf model under a downscaled view. These results substantially narrow the gap between available visual evidence and its generated read-out without auxiliary views at inference.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.13465 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2610.13465v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.13465 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 309 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

The Expensive-Loop Problem
LessWrong · 12 oct. 2026

The standard for agents you can trust: Lessons from the federal front lines
Snorkel AI Blog · 5 iun. 2026

Article: Governing AI in the Cloud: A Practical Guide for Architects
InfoQ · 15 iun. 2026

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · 26 aug. 2026