Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This research establishes a sharp Loewner envelope for coefficient covariance in volume-sampled least squares, defining precise geometric conditions under which spectral bounds become tight. By introducing a feature-only margin metric and residual-augmented measures, the study provides conservative certificates for cardinality decisions without relying on population generalization assumptions. These findings advance the theoretical understanding of uncertainty quantification in fixed-design regression models through rigorous spectral geometry.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

When Is the Sharp Covariance Envelope Tight? Feature-Only Geometry for Volume-Sampled Least Squares

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2608.26877v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Prior analyses by Derezinski and Warmuth established all-size sampling identities, selected-OLS unbiasedness, and inverse moments for ordinary volume sampling, while their exact arbitrary-fixed-response loss and prediction-covariance formulas are at the rank-size endpoint s=d. We establish a Loewner envelope for centered coefficient covariance for every full-rank fixed pool, response, and legal budget d 0 if and only if the normalized spectral envelope is strict for every compatible residual, whereas nu_A = 0 if and only if some compatible residual is spectrally tight; the same zero-margin residual is tight at every strict-interior budget. A residual-augmented change of measure supplies the response-aware mechanism and a one-sided quantitative slack bound, while support saturation proves the attainment direction. Critical equal-leverage geometry interprets the boundary, and sound lower certificates yield conservative same-primitive cardinality decisions. Frozen-feature examples show that the certificate is nonvacuous and measure the fixed-pool cost of its authorized reduction. The claims concern conditional centered, full-Gram-whitened coefficient covariance, not population generalization.

Title:When Is the Sharp Covariance Envelope Tight? Feature-Only Geometry for Volume-Sampled Least Squares

Abstract:Prior analyses by Derezinski and Warmuth established all-size sampling identities, selected-OLS unbiasedness, and inverse moments for ordinary volume sampling, while their exact arbitrary-fixed-response loss and prediction-covariance formulas are at the rank-size endpoint s=d. We establish a Loewner envelope for centered coefficient covariance for every full-rank fixed pool, response, and legal budget d <= s <= m under ordinary indexed fixed-size volume sampling followed by selected unweighted least squares; its coefficient is globally sharp over the full-rank class. Global sharpness does not determine attainability on the pool in hand. Under positive loss, strict-interior budgets, and no coloops, a feature-only margin nu_A gives the exact fixed-design spectral phase: nu_A > 0 if and only if the normalized spectral envelope is strict for every compatible residual, whereas nu_A = 0 if and only if some compatible residual is spectrally tight; the same zero-margin residual is tight at every strict-interior budget. A residual-augmented change of measure supplies the response-aware mechanism and a one-sided quantitative slack bound, while support saturation proves the attainment direction. Critical equal-leverage geometry interprets the boundary, and sound lower certificates yield conservative same-primitive cardinality decisions. Frozen-feature examples show that the certificate is nonvacuous and measure the fixed-pool cost of its authorized reduction. The claims concern conditional centered, full-Gram-whitened coefficient covariance, not population generalization.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2608.26877 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.26877v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26877 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

controlled_path_cell_record.csv

controlled_path_seed_manifest.csv

fixed_pool_cell_record.csv

fixed_pool_seed_manifest.csv

frozen_feature_cells.csv

frozen_feature_encoders.csv

frozen_feature_provenance.json

frozen_feature_refit_cells.csv

frozen_feature_refit_draws.csv

(6 additional files not shown) You must enabled JavaScript to view entire file list.

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 345 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe