When Does Retrieval Help? A Study of In-Context Adaptation in Vision-Language-Action Models

arXiv:2610.05492v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language-action (VLA) models have shown strong potential as generalist robot policies, but adapting them to unseen tasks often requires costly parameter updates. Recent work such as RICL introduces in-context adaptability by retrieving expert demonstrations based on the current VLA observation and providing them as additional context at test time. The effectiveness of this adaptation therefore depends critically on the retrieval mechanism. In this work, we systematically study how different retrieval methods affect both retrieval quality and task performance within the RICL framework. Specifically, we compare four different methods: image-based retrieval, retrieval augmented with VLA's state, retrieval using features from the VLA backbone, and random retrieval. Our experiments yield three main findings. First, no retrieval method consistently dominates the others in task success, while surprisingly, random retrieval achieves a non-trivial success rate. Second, standard retrieval-quality diagnostics do not reliably reflect downstream VLA performance. Third, demonstrations from different but related tasks can provide useful transferable information. Together, these results provide an initial step toward understanding how retrieval mechanisms shape the in-context learning capability of VLA models and their downstream task performance, while highlighting the need for more careful design and evaluation of retrieval mechanisms for reliable test-time adaptation.

Title:When Does Retrieval Help? A Study of In-Context Adaptation in Vision-Language-Action Models

Abstract:Vision-language-action (VLA) models have shown strong potential as generalist robot policies, but adapting them to unseen tasks often requires costly parameter updates. Recent work such as RICL introduces in-context adaptability by retrieving expert demonstrations based on the current VLA observation and providing them as additional context at test time. The effectiveness of this adaptation therefore depends critically on the retrieval mechanism. In this work, we systematically study how different retrieval methods affect both retrieval quality and task performance within the RICL framework. Specifically, we compare four different methods: image-based retrieval, retrieval augmented with VLA's state, retrieval using features from the VLA backbone, and random retrieval. Our experiments yield three main findings. First, no retrieval method consistently dominates the others in task success, while surprisingly, random retrieval achieves a non-trivial success rate. Second, standard retrieval-quality diagnostics do not reliably reflect downstream VLA performance. Third, demonstrations from different but related tasks can provide useful transferable information. Together, these results provide an initial step toward understanding how retrieval mechanisms shape the in-context learning capability of VLA models and their downstream task performance, while highlighting the need for more careful design and evaluation of retrieval mechanisms for reliable test-time adaptation.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.05492 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.05492v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05492 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

analiza aiqbench

When Does Retrieval Help? A Study of In-Context Adaptation in Vision-Language-Action Models

Subiecte conexe