analiza aiqbench
This research identifies a critical "transfer threshold" in robot learning where legacy demonstration data only becomes useful after an upgraded hardware configuration reaches a minimum level of task competence. The study reveals that blindly applying old data to new robots is ineffective until the system crosses this specific performance boundary, at which point co-training yields sharp gains before diminishing returns set in. These findings offer a practical framework for optimizing training pipelines by determining exactly when to prioritize collecting fresh demonstrations versus reusing historical datasets across hardware generations.
When Does Legacy Data Start to Help? Emergent Transfer in Cross-Configuration Robot Learning
arXiv:2607.25593v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robotic hardware evolves over time, but demonstration data is often tied to a specific sensor and actuator configuration. This raises a practical and underexplored question: when does legacy data begin to benefit an upgraded robot? We study this question on a wheeled humanoid platform across two hardware generations, where both the camera and gripper are changed while the overall morphology remains fixed. Contrary to the common assumption that more cross-configuration data is always helpful, we observe a grokking-like transition: legacy data remains ineffective until the upgraded configuration acquires a minimum level of task competence, after which co-training gains rise sharply before diminishing near saturation. We hypothesize that this task-dependent transition is governed by a transfer threshold and characterize the resulting three-phase pattern. Across real-robot manipulation tasks, we observe all three phases: no measurable benefit at low competence ($10.0\% \rightarrow 10.0\%$), a sharp gain after crossing the threshold ($23.3\% \rightarrow 86.7\%$ on flower insertion), and diminishing returns at high competence ($85.0\% \rightarrow 93.3\%$ on pen insertion). We provide a theoretical account based on gradient alignment and residual policy uncertainty, and derive a phase-aware rule for deciding when to collect more new-hardware data and when to reuse legacy demonstrations. We further validate this three-phase pattern on a mobile dual-arm watering task, with results consistent with our predictions.
Title:When Does Legacy Data Start to Help? Emergent Transfer in Cross-Configuration Robot Learning
Abstract:Robotic hardware evolves over time, but demonstration data is often tied to a specific sensor and actuator configuration. This raises a practical and underexplored question: when does legacy data begin to benefit an upgraded robot? We study this question on a wheeled humanoid platform across two hardware generations, where both the camera and gripper are changed while the overall morphology remains fixed. Contrary to the common assumption that more cross-configuration data is always helpful, we observe a grokking-like transition: legacy data remains ineffective until the upgraded configuration acquires a minimum level of task competence, after which co-training gains rise sharply before diminishing near saturation. We hypothesize that this task-dependent transition is governed by a transfer threshold and characterize the resulting three-phase pattern. Across real-robot manipulation tasks, we observe all three phases: no measurable benefit at low competence ($10.0\% \rightarrow 10.0\%$), a sharp gain after crossing the threshold ($23.3\% \rightarrow 86.7\%$ on flower insertion), and diminishing returns at high competence ($85.0\% \rightarrow 93.3\%$ on pen insertion). We provide a theoretical account based on gradient alignment and residual policy uncertainty, and derive a phase-aware rule for deciding when to collect more new-hardware data and when to reuse legacy demonstrations. We further validate this three-phase pattern on a mobile dual-arm watering task, with results consistent with our predictions.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2607.25593 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2607.25593v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.25593 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 321 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · 24 sept. 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · 21 mai 2026

Coherent (COHR) Q4 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
fool.com · 20 aug. 2026

Little Venice, Little Sparta: The UAE Statecraft Meets The War On Iran - Analysis
eurasiareview.com · 24 sept. 2026