analiza aiqbench
This study reveals that annotator disagreement in temporal laughter localization is structured rather than random noise, significantly impacting benchmark reliability when relying on single-reference ground truths. By proposing a disagreement-calibrated evaluation method using conformally calibrated tolerance bands, the authors offer a more robust framework for assessing audio event detection systems against human variability. This work advances the rigor of supervised learning benchmarks by accounting for inherent ambiguity in subjective annotation tasks.
When Does a Laugh Begin? Structured Annotator Disagreement in Temporal Laughter Localization
arXiv:2609.06646v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Annotators routinely disagree on laughter boundaries and subtle chuckles, yet temporal laughter localization typically evaluates against a single reference annotation. We show that this disagreement is structured rather than random noise. Re-annotating the SMILE-Temporal benchmark (672 videos, 1,683 events) with 3-5 annotators per video (alpha = 0.757), we find systematic patterns: disagreement is 1.73 times larger at offsets than onsets, far more common for chuckles than full laughs (77% vs. 20%), and predictable from event attributes (AUC = 0.831). Evaluating against a single annotator breaks down under this structure: system scores shift by 0.246 F1 depending on the chosen ground truth, correctly ranking systems only 69.7% of the time (vs. 80% against all annotators). We propose a disagreement-calibrated evaluation that scores predictions against the full annotator distribution using conformally calibrated tolerance bands (wider at offsets, 0.727s, than onsets, 0.5s). The per-annotator annotations and analysis code are available at https://github.com/WSCSports/SMILE-Disagreement .
Title:When Does a Laugh Begin? Structured Annotator Disagreement in Temporal Laughter Localization
Abstract:Annotators routinely disagree on laughter boundaries and subtle chuckles, yet temporal laughter localization typically evaluates against a single reference annotation. We show that this disagreement is structured rather than random noise. Re-annotating the SMILE-Temporal benchmark (672 videos, 1,683 events) with 3-5 annotators per video (alpha = 0.757), we find systematic patterns: disagreement is 1.73 times larger at offsets than onsets, far more common for chuckles than full laughs (77% vs. 20%), and predictable from event attributes (AUC = 0.831). Evaluating against a single annotator breaks down under this structure: system scores shift by 0.246 F1 depending on the chosen ground truth, correctly ranking systems only 69.7% of the time (vs. 80% against all annotators). We propose a disagreement-calibrated evaluation that scores predictions against the full annotator distribution using conformally calibrated tolerance bands (wider at offsets, 0.727s, than onsets, 0.5s). The per-annotator annotations and analysis code are available at this https URL .
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.06646 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2609.06646v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.06646 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 264 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Loss Knows Best: Detecting Annotation Errors in Videos via Loss Trajectories
arXiv · 4 sept. 2026

It’s about ethics in journalism, with Ben Smith
The Verge · 17 aug. 2026
Beyond Scalar IoU: Structured Verification from Rollout Groups for Video Temporal Grounding
arXiv · 7 oct. 2026
The Differential Reasoning Router: Operationalizing Cost-Aware LLM Annotation in E-commerce
arXiv · 1 sept. 2026