analiza aiqbench
This research addresses critical reliability issues in LLM agents by framing memory misuse as a fuzzing problem, systematically uncovering failures that standard evaluation methods miss. The proposed U-Fuzz framework effectively identifies query-related and memory-state errors across diverse architectures, even when internal retrieval mechanisms are obscured from the tester. For developers building autonomous agents, this work highlights the necessity of robust testing protocols to ensure persistent memory does not degrade interaction quality over time.
When Correct Memory Goes Wrong: Fuzzing Persistent Memory Use in LLM Agents
arXiv:2609.38275v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Persistent memory helps LLM agents carry information across long interactions, but correct memory can still be used incorrectly when queries change or memory states evolve. Existing work mainly studies memory content errors or evaluates fixed test cases, leaving memory-use failures hard to discover systematically. We formulate this issue as a fuzzing problem and categorize such failures into query-related and memory-state failures. We then develop U-Fuzz, which starts from memory checkpoints as test seeds, mutates queries or memory states under explicit mutation obligations, validates each mutant, and uses observed memory behavior to guide iterative testing while keeping failure labels outside the search. We evaluate U-Fuzz across several memory systems against diverse fuzzing baselines, and further test an output-only setting with API-based LLMs where memory retrieval is hidden. Across these settings, U-Fuzz consistently uncovers more confirmed memory-use failures, showing that its search remains effective across different memory architectures and even when only final responses are observable.
Abstract:Persistent memory helps LLM agents carry information across long interactions, but correct memory can still be used incorrectly when queries change or memory states evolve. Existing work mainly studies memory content errors or evaluates fixed test cases, leaving memory-use failures hard to discover systematically. We formulate this issue as a fuzzing problem and categorize such failures into query-related and memory-state failures. We then develop U-Fuzz, which starts from memory checkpoints as test seeds, mutates queries or memory states under explicit mutation obligations, validates each mutant, and uses observed memory behavior to guide iterative testing while keeping failure labels outside the search. We evaluate U-Fuzz across several memory systems against diverse fuzzing baselines, and further test an output-only setting with API-based LLMs where memory retrieval is hidden. Across these settings, U-Fuzz consistently uncovers more confirmed memory-use failures, showing that its search remains effective across different memory architectures and even when only final responses are observable.
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.38275 [cs.DC]
(or arXiv:2609.38275v1 [cs.DC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38275 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 254 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Presentation: The Agent Harness: Control Planes, Invariants, and Approval Boundaries for Production AI Agents
InfoQ · 21 sept. 2026
Does preservation make sense before we know how to revive?
LessWrong · 15 iun. 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · 15 aug. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026