analiza aiqbench
This paper introduces PACE, a new benchmark evaluating coding agents' ability to fully execute Product Requirement Documents within mature enterprise repositories. The study reveals significant delivery gaps where models succeed at generating individual components but fail at complete integration and requirement fulfillment, offering actionable insights for refining agent harnesses.
When Coding Agents Outpace Review: Evaluating PRD-Driven Development in Mature Enterprise Repositories
arXiv:2610.26394v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Coding agents increasingly undertake development tasks in mature enterprise repositories, yet existing benchmarks offer limited insight into whether they fulfill complete Product Requirement Documents (PRDs) and where delivery breaks down. Issue resolution and development from scratch leave incremental PRD fulfillment underexplored, while isolated tests provide incomplete evidence of business and integration requirements. We introduce PACE, a benchmark of 43 enterprise tasks with 750 expert-audited Code Points. It combines requirement reconstruction, criterion construction, and evidence-based evaluation to measure PRD fulfillment and connect delivery gaps to agent behavior. Across 11 model--scaffold configurations, most scores fall between 52.1 and 78.1; GPT-5.6-Sol achieves the highest complete-delivery rate of 14.0\%. Incomplete implementation and missing integration are the principal bottlenecks: producing individual components does not ensure a complete delivery. Evaluation achieves 95.2\% agreement with expert consensus, with lower case-level variation across judging records than repeated executions. Beyond model comparison, the benchmark provides actionable feedback for harness refinement: diagnosis guides targeted improvements, and successive harness releases raise mean performance from 59.4 to 63.0 using the same model and task suite. Code is available at https://github.com/TianqiLiu1/PACE-Bench.
Abstract:Coding agents increasingly undertake development tasks in mature enterprise repositories, yet existing benchmarks offer limited insight into whether they fulfill complete Product Requirement Documents (PRDs) and where delivery breaks down. Issue resolution and development from scratch leave incremental PRD fulfillment underexplored, while isolated tests provide incomplete evidence of business and integration requirements. We introduce PACE, a benchmark of 43 enterprise tasks with 750 expert-audited Code Points. It combines requirement reconstruction, criterion construction, and evidence-based evaluation to measure PRD fulfillment and connect delivery gaps to agent behavior. Across 11 model--scaffold configurations, most scores fall between 52.1 and 78.1; GPT-5.6-Sol achieves the highest complete-delivery rate of 14.0\%. Incomplete implementation and missing integration are the principal bottlenecks: producing individual components does not ensure a complete delivery. Evaluation achieves 95.2\% agreement with expert consensus, with lower case-level variation across judging records than repeated executions. Beyond model comparison, the benchmark provides actionable feedback for harness refinement: diagnosis guides targeted improvements, and successive harness releases raise mean performance from 59.4 to 63.0 using the same model and task suite. Code is available at this https URL.
Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.26394 [cs.SE]
(or arXiv:2610.26394v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.26394 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 275 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

GlassWorm Supply Chain Attack Uses Fake VS Code Themes to Deliver Hidden Malware
Cybersecurity News · 5 oct. 2026
Skill Dreaming: Evolving Repository Skills through Pull Request Streams
arXiv · 29 oct. 2026

Package managers have an integrity problem
Trail of Bits Blog · 14 oct. 2026
Don't Guess, Just Ask: Evaluating Interactive Requirement Clarification for Repository-Level Software Development
arXiv · 12 oct. 2026