analiza aiqbench
This research systematically audits open-weight LLMs using persona vectors to map the internal organization of behaviors that models express, hide, or resist. By categorizing traits as natural defaults, steerable latents, or intractable refusals, the study reveals how standard extraction methods fail on specific undesirable outputs like "evil" while fine-tuned variants can recover them via chain-of-thought residuals. The findings provide a critical probe into behavioral asymmetries that go beyond simple prompting capabilities to understand latent model constraints and amplification potentials.
What Models Express, Suppress, and Resist: Auditing Open-Weight LLMs with Persona Vectors
arXiv:2607.13162v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: What a language model will and will not do is largely set during post-training, but which behaviors it expresses, hides, or resists is not revealed by prompting alone. Persona vectors, behavioral directions in activation space, can probe this organization, but prior work covers only a handful of traits. We present the first systematic application of persona vectors at this scale, compiling a 53-trait inventory across four behaviorally distinct domains and labeling every trait in two open-weight models as natural (expressed at baseline), steerable latent but amplifiable, or intractable (resistant to standard extraction). Both models default to helpful, task-oriented behavior: all nine agentic traits are natural, and their default clinician behavior matches a board-certified psychologist's independent desirability judgments on 16 of 17 traits. Steering produces its largest gains on traits these defaults exclude: hyperbole, hallucination, and sycophancy. The same asymmetry holds across all 171 generic-trait pairs: two steerable traits can collapse the composition, but pairs involving a default never do. Where standard extraction fails on a trait like "evil," a vector transferred from a fine-tuned variant still recovers it, with the residual refusals appearing inside the model's chain-of-thought. Persona vectors are most informative not as a set of controls but as a probe of behavioral organization.
Abstract:What a language model will and will not do is largely set during post-training, but which behaviors it expresses, hides, or resists is not revealed by prompting alone. Persona vectors, behavioral directions in activation space, can probe this organization, but prior work covers only a handful of traits. We present the first systematic application of persona vectors at this scale, compiling a 53-trait inventory across four behaviorally distinct domains and labeling every trait in two open-weight models as natural (expressed at baseline), steerable latent but amplifiable, or intractable (resistant to standard extraction). Both models default to helpful, task-oriented behavior: all nine agentic traits are natural, and their default clinician behavior matches a board-certified psychologist's independent desirability judgments on 16 of 17 traits. Steering produces its largest gains on traits these defaults exclude: hyperbole, hallucination, and sycophancy. The same asymmetry holds across all 171 generic-trait pairs: two steerable traits can collapse the composition, but pairs involving a default never do. Where standard extraction fails on a trait like "evil," a vector transferred from a fine-tuned variant still recovers it, with the residual refusals appearing inside the model's chain-of-thought. Persona vectors are most informative not as a set of controls but as a probe of behavioral organization.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.13162 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.13162v3 [cs.CL] for this version)
From: Ali Emami Dr. [view email] [v1] Tue, 14 Jul 2026 18:10:20 UTC (1,583 KB) [v2] Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:37:07 UTC (1,583 KB) [v3] Fri, 17 Jul 2026 15:37:15 UTC (1,583 KB)
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 253 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026
Do AI models assist with human rights violations?
LessWrong · 29 sept. 2026
A Red Line and Oversight Framework for Government AI Contracts
AI Alignment Forum · 18 iul. 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026