analiza aiqbench
This study investigates how language model embeddings of image captions predict neural activity in the human brain's high-level visual regions, revealing that machine-generated descriptions often outperform human annotations and text embedders surpass autoregressive models for this task. The research identifies intermediate network layers as critical points where syntactic and semantic structures emerge to maximize alignment with both brain responses and behavioral judgments. These findings clarify key variables—caption content and model architecture—that determine the efficacy of linguistic representations in modeling biological visual perception.
What Makes Linguistic Representations Good Models of High-Level Visual Perception in the Human Brain?
arXiv:2607.16214v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Image descriptions represented with language models (LMs) predict human brain responses to naturalistic images in high-level visual regions, but the factors driving this predictivity remain unclear. To investigate this, we systematically studied how images are described and which language models are used to embed those descriptions. For a common set of images, we considered six caption types -- including human-annotated and multiple machine-generated captions -- differing along several dimensions. Each caption was represented with five LMs, spanning autoregressive LMs trained to predict upcoming words and text embedders, i.e., LMs fine-tuned on semantic tasks requiring sentence/document-level representations. Machine-generated captions yielded significant brain predictivity and alignment, often surpassing human-annotated captions used in previous work. Across caption types, text embedders consistently outperformed autoregressive LMs, a pattern replicated when measuring behavioural alignment with image-similarity judgments. Analyses of caption representations from different model layers further revealed that both brain predictivity and behavioural alignment peak at intermediate network depth, shortly after a point thought to mark the emergence of syntactic and semantic structure. Altogether, our results demonstrate that both the content of image captions and the LM used to represent them influence brain- and behaviour-modelling performance, establishing caption embeddings as a useful tool for studying high-level visual perception.
Title:What Makes Linguistic Representations Good Models of High-Level Visual Perception in the Human Brain?
Abstract:Image descriptions represented with language models (LMs) predict human brain responses to naturalistic images in high-level visual regions, but the factors driving this predictivity remain unclear. To investigate this, we systematically studied how images are described and which language models are used to embed those descriptions. For a common set of images, we considered six caption types -- including human-annotated and multiple machine-generated captions -- differing along several dimensions. Each caption was represented with five LMs, spanning autoregressive LMs trained to predict upcoming words and text embedders, i.e., LMs fine-tuned on semantic tasks requiring sentence/document-level representations. Machine-generated captions yielded significant brain predictivity and alignment, often surpassing human-annotated captions used in previous work. Across caption types, text embedders consistently outperformed autoregressive LMs, a pattern replicated when measuring behavioural alignment with image-similarity judgments. Analyses of caption representations from different model layers further revealed that both brain predictivity and behavioural alignment peak at intermediate network depth, shortly after a point thought to mark the emergence of syntactic and semantic structure. Altogether, our results demonstrate that both the content of image captions and the LM used to represent them influence brain- and behaviour-modelling performance, establishing caption embeddings as a useful tool for studying high-level visual perception.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.16214 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2607.16214v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.16214 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 314 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026
Reasons to believe current AI models are conscious
LessWrong · 17 iul. 2026
Productionizing TurboQuant on AMD GPUs for KV-Cache-Bound LLM Inference
AMD · 11 iun. 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026