analiza aiqbench
This study systematically evaluates intrinsic geometric and transformation-based properties across 12 music foundation models to determine optimal feature extraction layers for downstream tasks like genre classification, emotion recognition, and beat tracking. The research reveals that standard metrics fail on tonal tasks such as key estimation but introduces a pitch-transposition equivariance measure that effectively captures representation quality specifically for harmonic analysis. Ultimately, the findings demonstrate that these intrinsic proxies can match or exceed trainable multi-layer fusion methods, particularly when data is limited.
What Makes a Good Layer? Assessing the Layer-Wise Intrinsic Properties of Music Foundation Models
arXiv:2608.14819v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Music foundation models are commonly used as frozen audio feature extractors, yet selecting which layer to extract from remains largely heuristic. Current practice defaults to fixed depths or multi-layer fusion, with limited understanding of why certain layers transfer better across downstream tasks or how representation quality varies with depth and pre-training paradigm. We conduct a systematic layer-wise analysis of 12 music foundation models spanning three pre-training paradigms (masked modeling, autoregressive modeling, and contrastive learning), characterizing their hidden representations through intrinsic geometric and transformation-based properties. Correlating label-free representation-quality metrics with layer-wise performance across 15 downstream tasks, we find that several metrics track layer quality for genre classification, emotion recognition, automatic tagging, and beat tracking, albeit with varying strength across tasks and pre-training paradigms. However, all metrics fail on tonal tasks such as key estimation and chord recognition, indicating that no single property serves as a general proxy for representation quality across music information retrieval tasks. To address this gap, we introduce a pitch-transposition equivariance measure that captures properties missed by these standard metrics, providing a consistent indicator of tonal quality across model families. Finally, we show that intrinsic metrics can serve as effective proxies for layer selection, matching or outperforming trainable multi-layer fusion methods, particularly in limited-data settings.
Title:What Makes a Good Layer? Assessing the Layer-Wise Intrinsic Properties of Music Foundation Models
Abstract:Music foundation models are commonly used as frozen audio feature extractors, yet selecting which layer to extract from remains largely heuristic. Current practice defaults to fixed depths or multi-layer fusion, with limited understanding of why certain layers transfer better across downstream tasks or how representation quality varies with depth and pre-training paradigm. We conduct a systematic layer-wise analysis of 12 music foundation models spanning three pre-training paradigms (masked modeling, autoregressive modeling, and contrastive learning), characterizing their hidden representations through intrinsic geometric and transformation-based properties. Correlating label-free representation-quality metrics with layer-wise performance across 15 downstream tasks, we find that several metrics track layer quality for genre classification, emotion recognition, automatic tagging, and beat tracking, albeit with varying strength across tasks and pre-training paradigms. However, all metrics fail on tonal tasks such as key estimation and chord recognition, indicating that no single property serves as a general proxy for representation quality across music information retrieval tasks. To address this gap, we introduce a pitch-transposition equivariance measure that captures properties missed by these standard metrics, providing a consistent indicator of tonal quality across model families. Finally, we show that intrinsic metrics can serve as effective proxies for layer selection, matching or outperforming trainable multi-layer fusion methods, particularly in limited-data settings.
11 pages, 2 figures, 2 tables. Accepted at ISMIR 2026. Project page: this https URL
Sound (cs.SD); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)
arXiv:2608.14819 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2608.14819v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14819 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 337 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · 2 oct. 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026

Chris Ballance, The British Quantum Entrepreneur Who Put Ion Traps On A Chip
Quantum Zeitgeist · 5 aug. 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · 27 iul. 2026