Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This study reveals a fundamental ceiling in machine olfaction where public descriptor corpora fail to capture the "valence" dimension of scent, regardless of model capacity or encoding choices. The research demonstrates that simply merging datasets does not resolve heterogeneity between sources, indicating that explicit measurement of pleasantness is required rather than relying on structural descriptors alone. For AI researchers in sensory computing, this highlights a critical gap between current data-driven approaches and human perceptual reliability.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

What an odour descriptor corpus can and cannot measure: valence, attenuation, and the ceiling of the public record

arXiv3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2609.12875v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine olfaction trains on pooled public descriptor corpora, but whether a shared descriptor word measures the same thing across corpora has not been tested, nor has the ceiling of what any of them can measure. We audit four corpora from Pyrfume. Conditioning on the molecule makes McNemar's test the exact conditional test of the corpus effect. Corpora disagree heterogeneously across descriptors ($I^2 = 80\%$) and non-uniformly with labelling breadth ($z = 17.2$), so no single offset repairs pooling. Median tetrachoric agreement is 0.795 against median $\kappa$ of 0.413: sources largely concur on which molecules deserve a word and differ on how readily they apply it. Of 109 descriptors with an estimable effect, 36 show large differential functioning on the ETS scale. Against a human panel's reliability, Morgan fingerprints with the full RDKit descriptor block reach 32.9\% of achievable; adding every label from two merged corpora reaches 33.9\%. The gap does not close with model capacity, encoding choice, more molecules, or more words. The missing variance is valence. One pleasantness rating per molecule reaches 54.6\% of achievable (57.1\% on an independent older instrument). Valence recovered from descriptors ($\rho = 0.457$) yields only 16.6\%, so it must be measured. Five raters exceed structure plus the full descriptor record; fifteen to twenty saturate. We release a descriptor crosswalk and twenty machine-checked theorems.

Abstract:Machine olfaction trains on pooled public descriptor corpora, but whether a shared descriptor word measures the same thing across corpora has not been tested, nor has the ceiling of what any of them can measure. We audit four corpora from Pyrfume. Conditioning on the molecule makes McNemar's test the exact conditional test of the corpus effect. Corpora disagree heterogeneously across descriptors ($I^2 = 80\%$) and non-uniformly with labelling breadth ($z = 17.2$), so no single offset repairs pooling. Median tetrachoric agreement is 0.795 against median $\kappa$ of 0.413: sources largely concur on which molecules deserve a word and differ on how readily they apply it. Of 109 descriptors with an estimable effect, 36 show large differential functioning on the ETS scale. Against a human panel's reliability, Morgan fingerprints with the full RDKit descriptor block reach 32.9\% of achievable; adding every label from two merged corpora reaches 33.9\%. The gap does not close with model capacity, encoding choice, more molecules, or more words. The missing variance is valence. One pleasantness rating per molecule reaches 54.6\% of achievable (57.1\% on an independent older instrument). Valence recovered from descriptors ($\rho = 0.457$) yields only 16.6\%, so it must be measured. Five raters exceed structure plus the full descriptor record; fifteen to twenty saturate. We release a descriptor crosswalk and twenty machine-checked theorems.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.12875 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.12875v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.12875 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 313 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe