analiza aiqbench
This research addresses a critical gap in LLM-based data-analysis agents by elevating the initial "Data Exploration" phase—such as identifying logical tables and recovering relationships—to an explicit, evaluable stage. The study demonstrates that explicitly modeling these structural understanding tasks before generating downstream answers significantly improves overall correctness on complex workbooks. By introducing new benchmark settings to measure dataset comprehension directly, this work provides a necessary foundation for building more reliable and human-verifiable AI data tools.
Walk Before You Run: The Importance of Data Exploration for Data Analysis Agents
arXiv:2608.16045v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based data-analysis tools are increasingly used to help users analyze messy spreadsheets and workbooks, from answering questions over uploaded files to generating code, summaries, and visualizations. These systems are often evaluated by the correctness of their final downstream answers. However, reliable data analysis also depends on an earlier step: understanding what the dataset contains before solving the requested task. For complex workbooks, this Data Exploration step includes identifying the logical tables behind physical sheets, interpreting column semantics, recovering keys and relationships, and detecting quality issues. In current tools and benchmarks, this step is usually left implicit, creating a gap between downstream task performance and the dataset understanding needed for reliable, human-checkable analysis. Our key contribution is to identify this overlooked gap, make Data Exploration a first-class evaluation target, and show through downstream experiments that stronger Data Exploration support improves task performance. To evaluate dataset understanding directly, we introduce two benchmark settings: a real multi-sheet workbook benchmark based on a Vitamin D study dataset, and an extension of DSBench with schema-fixed Data Exploration artifacts. In both settings, systems are evaluated by the quality of a structured artifact capturing tables, columns, semantic roles, relationships, and profiling signals. Our results show that strong LLMs and data-analysis agents still miss important logical structure even when they read spreadsheet content. Furthermore, explicit Data Exploration support often improves downstream correctness, suggesting it should be treated as a first-class, inspectable stage in LLM data-analysis workflows and a natural human-in-the-loop checkpoint where domain experts can review and correct the artifact before downstream analysis proceeds.
Abstract:LLM-based data-analysis tools are increasingly used to help users analyze messy spreadsheets and workbooks, from answering questions over uploaded files to generating code, summaries, and visualizations. These systems are often evaluated by the correctness of their final downstream answers. However, reliable data analysis also depends on an earlier step: understanding what the dataset contains before solving the requested task. For complex workbooks, this Data Exploration step includes identifying the logical tables behind physical sheets, interpreting column semantics, recovering keys and relationships, and detecting quality issues. In current tools and benchmarks, this step is usually left implicit, creating a gap between downstream task performance and the dataset understanding needed for reliable, human-checkable analysis. Our key contribution is to identify this overlooked gap, make Data Exploration a first-class evaluation target, and show through downstream experiments that stronger Data Exploration support improves task performance. To evaluate dataset understanding directly, we introduce two benchmark settings: a real multi-sheet workbook benchmark based on a Vitamin D study dataset, and an extension of DSBench with schema-fixed Data Exploration artifacts. In both settings, systems are evaluated by the quality of a structured artifact capturing tables, columns, semantic roles, relationships, and profiling signals. Our results show that strong LLMs and data-analysis agents still miss important logical structure even when they read spreadsheet content. Furthermore, explicit Data Exploration support often improves downstream correctness, suggesting it should be treated as a first-class, inspectable stage in LLM data-analysis workflows and a natural human-in-the-loop checkpoint where domain experts can review and correct the artifact before downstream analysis proceeds.
9 pages, 6 figures. Accepted to VLDB 2026 Workshop: DASHSys: Systems for Data-centric Agents with Human-in-the-loop
Databases (cs.DB); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.16045 [cs.DB]
(or arXiv:2608.16045v1 [cs.DB] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16045 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 368 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · 16 iul. 2026

[AINews] The Future of Latent Space
Latent Space · 25 sept. 2026

Presentation: Building Evals for AI Adoption: from Principles to Practice
InfoQ · 29 mai 2026