analiza aiqbench
This paper proposes replacing the token-by-token LLM decoders in vision-language-action robot models with a small latent control loop that uses a JEPA-style predictor and flow matching to produce whole action chunks in a few steps. The reported gains are latency and model size: under 20M trainable parameters and 10-14 ms per decision on an Apple M4. The only task result is a 40.0% success rate on LIBERO-10 from a single training run, and the authors themselves call it a preliminary proof of concept, so readers should treat the speedup as promising but not yet shown to hold up against stronger baselines.
Vision-Predictor-Action: Towards Efficient Embodied AI via Neuro-Symbolic JEPA Predictors
arXiv:2610.15556v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models commonly generate robot actions token by token through Large Language Model (LLM) decoders, causing inference latency to grow with action sequence length and limiting closed-loop control frequency. We present Goal-Conditioned Vision-Predictor-Action (VPA), which replaces autoregressive decoders with a lightweight latent control loop. A shared vision encoder and a frozen text encoder embed observations, goal images, and instructions; a neuro-symbolic selector chooses a discrete skill; a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) predictor forecasts the next latent state; and a flow-matching solver generates an entire action chunk in a few integration steps, so that sequential network evaluations per decision step do not depend on the action horizon. We analyze inference complexity, regularization against representation collapse, and conditions under which latent sub-goal thresholding limits error accumulation across task phases. As an initial proof of concept, we evaluated VPA on the LIBERO-10 suite. The trainable model has under 20M parameters (checkpoint under 75 MB, excluding a frozen 63.4M-parameter CLIP text encoder); a decision step of a single-camera reference configuration takes 10-14 ms on an Apple M4; and trained only on LIBERO-10 demonstrations in under three hours on a single GPU, a two-camera policy succeeded in 40.0% of 200 evaluation episodes. These preliminary results from a single training run suggest the approach is workable. Code and weights are available at https://github.com/ylee-sling/Vision-Predictor-Action and https://huggingface.co/ylee-sling/vpa-libero10, and archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22960920.
Abstract:Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models commonly generate robot actions token by token through Large Language Model (LLM) decoders, causing inference latency to grow with action sequence length and limiting closed-loop control frequency. We present Goal-Conditioned Vision-Predictor-Action (VPA), which replaces autoregressive decoders with a lightweight latent control loop. A shared vision encoder and a frozen text encoder embed observations, goal images, and instructions; a neuro-symbolic selector chooses a discrete skill; a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) predictor forecasts the next latent state; and a flow-matching solver generates an entire action chunk in a few integration steps, so that sequential network evaluations per decision step do not depend on the action horizon. We analyze inference complexity, regularization against representation collapse, and conditions under which latent sub-goal thresholding limits error accumulation across task phases. As an initial proof of concept, we evaluated VPA on the LIBERO-10 suite. The trainable model has under 20M parameters (checkpoint under 75 MB, excluding a frozen 63.4M-parameter CLIP text encoder); a decision step of a single-camera reference configuration takes 10-14 ms on an Apple M4; and trained only on LIBERO-10 demonstrations in under three hours on a single GPU, a two-camera policy succeeded in 40.0% of 200 evaluation episodes. These preliminary results from a single training run suggest the approach is workable. Code and weights are available at this https URL and this https URL, and archived at this https URL.
26 pages, 5 figures, 4 tables. Code: this https URL | Checkpoints: this https URL | Zenodo: this https URL
Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2610.15556 [cs.LO]
(or arXiv:2610.15556v1 [cs.LO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15556 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 351 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026

Academia is for Ambition — Alex Zhang, MIT
Latent Space · 2 oct. 2026

Build a Physical AI model factory with NVIDIA Cosmos 3 on SageMaker HyperPod
AWS · 4 sept. 2026
Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots
Google DeepMind · 28 iul. 2026