analiza aiqbench
This study investigates how data visualization practitioners actively integrate Large Language Models into their workflows, identifying a new pattern termed "vibe analysis" that mirrors the rise of vibe coding in software development. While LLMs offer speed and creativity, the research highlights critical friction points specific to visual data, such as verifying chart accuracy and bridging gaps in domain knowledge. These findings are essential for researchers aiming to build AI tools that effectively support complex visualization tasks without compromising data integrity or design best practices.
Vibe Analysis: Exploring LLM Adoption by Data Visualization Practitioners
arXiv:2609.31922v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are enticing in their promise to support data visualization (Vis) through faster and simpler workflows for data prep, analysis, and visualization creation. Yet LLMs are notoriously error-prone and not built for data visualization tasks. Few studies have explored LLM adoption among Vis practitioners. To fill this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with members of the Data Visualization Society, a global community of data visualization designers. Our findings show that Vis designers actively use LLMs for both creative and technical aspects of the visualization process. A new visualization workflow is emerging, a process we call vibe analysis, analogous to vibe coding. Some key challenges raised by participants parallel those of vibe coding, while others are Vis-specific, like gaps in Vis knowledge and chart verification. This work opens up opportunities for research combining LLM-mediated work with Vis tools that incorporate data visualization guidance, constraints, and best practices.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are enticing in their promise to support data visualization (Vis) through faster and simpler workflows for data prep, analysis, and visualization creation. Yet LLMs are notoriously error-prone and not built for data visualization tasks. Few studies have explored LLM adoption among Vis practitioners. To fill this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with members of the Data Visualization Society, a global community of data visualization designers. Our findings show that Vis designers actively use LLMs for both creative and technical aspects of the visualization process. A new visualization workflow is emerging, a process we call vibe analysis, analogous to vibe coding. Some key challenges raised by participants parallel those of vibe coding, while others are Vis-specific, like gaps in Vis knowledge and chart verification. This work opens up opportunities for research combining LLM-mediated work with Vis tools that incorporate data visualization guidance, constraints, and best practices.
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.31922 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2609.31922v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31922 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 246 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · 2 oct. 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · 31 iul. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026

100 things we announced at I/O 2026
Google · 20 mai 2026