Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

VCIFBench addresses a critical gap in multimodal AI evaluation by testing whether models can adhere to complex, conflicting constraints within video understanding tasks. The study reveals that current large language models often prioritize executing a subset of feasible instructions rather than detecting global incompatibilities, highlighting persistent challenges in joint constraint satisfaction. This benchmark provides essential data for researchers aiming to improve instruction-following robustness and reliability in next-generation vision-language systems.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, Latent Space, Slack Blog
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

VCIFBench: Evaluating Complex Instruction Following for Video Understanding

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2606.04588v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multimodal large language models have made rapid progress in video understanding, yet existing benchmarks largely rely on simple prompts and provide limited evidence about whether models can satisfy explicit output constraints. We introduce VCIFBench, a benchmark for evaluating complex instruction following in video understanding. VCIFBench constructs constraint-rich instructions from both benchmark-adapted and directly video-grounded prompts, covering content, format, style, and structure requirements, and evaluates model outputs with a hybrid verification pipeline. The benchmark contains 306 satisfiable test instructions, 540 DPO training instances, and a 100-item diagnostic set for evaluating whether models can recognize instruction conflicts. Experiments on 10 MLLMs show that joint constraint satisfaction remains challenging. Preference optimization improves instruction following for two model families, while Conflict-100 reveals that models usually execute a satisfiable-looking subset instead of detecting global incompatibility.

Abstract:Multimodal large language models have made rapid progress in video understanding, yet existing benchmarks largely rely on simple prompts and provide limited evidence about whether models can satisfy explicit output constraints. We introduce VCIFBench, a benchmark for evaluating complex instruction following in video understanding. VCIFBench constructs constraint-rich instructions from both benchmark-adapted and directly video-grounded prompts, covering content, format, style, and structure requirements, and evaluates model outputs with a hybrid verification pipeline. The benchmark contains 306 satisfiable test instructions, 540 DPO training instances, and a 100-item diagnostic set for evaluating whether models can recognize instruction conflicts. Experiments on 10 MLLMs show that joint constraint satisfaction remains challenging. Preference optimization improves instruction following for two model families, while Conflict-100 reveals that models usually execute a satisfiable-looking subset instead of detecting global incompatibility.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2606.04588 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2606.04588v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04588 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 223 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe