analiza aiqbench
This paper proposes a generative Gaussian process regression framework designed to adaptively mitigate outlier contamination without sacrificing the standard cubic computational complexity of traditional GPR methods. By employing variational generalized expectation-maximization, it effectively learns latent variables for observation-specific noise modeling while maintaining competitive prediction accuracy on real-world datasets. The work represents a significant advancement in robust machine learning algorithms essential for reliable model training under noisy conditions.
Variational Outlier-Robust Gaussian Process Regression with Generative Modeling
arXiv:2608.16606v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Outliers can substantially distort Gaussian process regression (GPR) due to its conventional Gaussian observation likelihood, leading to inaccurate model learning and prediction. To address this limitation, this article introduces a generative GPR model that captures observation-specific contamination and adaptively mitigates the influence of outliers. Subsequently, a variational generalized expectation-maximization procedure is used to learn the latent variables and GPR model parameters. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets under different contamination settings demonstrate that the proposed method remains competitive with-and in several cases outperforms-robust GPR baselines in prediction accuracy. Moreover, the proposed method shares the cubic computational scaling of the compared GPR methods.
Abstract:Outliers can substantially distort Gaussian process regression (GPR) due to its conventional Gaussian observation likelihood, leading to inaccurate model learning and prediction. To address this limitation, this article introduces a generative GPR model that captures observation-specific contamination and adaptively mitigates the influence of outliers. Subsequently, a variational generalized expectation-maximization procedure is used to learn the latent variables and GPR model parameters. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets under different contamination settings demonstrate that the proposed method remains competitive with-and in several cases outperforms-robust GPR baselines in prediction accuracy. Moreover, the proposed method shares the cubic computational scaling of the compared GPR methods.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.16606 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.16606v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16606 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 196 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · 1 sept. 2026
Dirichlet Process Mixtures of Trees with Gaussian Process Splits: A Bayesian Nonparametric Framework with Posterior Contraction Rate
arXiv · 24 sept. 2026

Exploding variance of means of exponentials: least-squares to the rescue – Machine Learning Research Blog
francisbach.com · 27 sept. 2026
DiffuSent: Towards a Unified Diffusion Framework for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis
arXiv · 1 sept. 2026