analiza aiqbench
This study investigates unfair sampling in quantum annealing for weighted graph bipartitioning problems, revealing that increasing penalty coefficients generally improves solution diversity on D-Wave hardware despite reducing ground-state probability. The findings highlight a critical trade-off between sampling fairness and optimization success rates in constrained combinatorial tasks, calling for deeper theoretical models to explain these behaviors across larger system sizes.
Unfair Sampling of Quantum Annealing in Weighted Graph Bipartitioning Problems
arXiv:2604.11449v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Quantum annealing (QA) is a promising approach for solving combinatorial optimization problems; however, it is known to exhibit unfair sampling, in which degenerate ground states are not sampled with equal probability even for sufficiently long annealing times. Fair sampling is important in applications such as solution diversity assessment and combinatorial counting, yet the mechanism of unfair sampling remains poorly understood, particularly in constrained combinatorial optimization problems. In this work, we investigate unfair sampling of QA in weighted graph bipartitioning problems (GBP), a representative constrained optimization problem. We study how the penalty coefficient in the penalty method affects sampling fairness. Through numerical simulations and experiments on the D-Wave Advantage2 system, we show that increasing the penalty coefficient reduces unfair sampling in a representative single instance, and that this qualitative behavior is also observed on actual hardware. A scaling analysis over randomly generated instances with up to 12 spins reveals that, while this trend does not hold universally, more than 70% of instances exhibit monotonically increasing sampling fairness as the penalty coefficient increases, even at the largest system size studied. These results show that increasing the penalty coefficient improves sampling fairness, though at the cost of ground-state probability under practical annealing conditions, and call for a deeper theoretical understanding of unfair sampling in constrained optimization problems.
Abstract:Quantum annealing (QA) is a promising approach for solving combinatorial optimization problems; however, it is known to exhibit unfair sampling, in which degenerate ground states are not sampled with equal probability even for sufficiently long annealing times. Fair sampling is important in applications such as solution diversity assessment and combinatorial counting, yet the mechanism of unfair sampling remains poorly understood, particularly in constrained combinatorial optimization problems. In this work, we investigate unfair sampling of QA in weighted graph bipartitioning problems (GBP), a representative constrained optimization problem. We study how the penalty coefficient in the penalty method affects sampling fairness. Through numerical simulations and experiments on the D-Wave Advantage2 system, we show that increasing the penalty coefficient reduces unfair sampling in a representative single instance, and that this qualitative behavior is also observed on actual hardware. A scaling analysis over randomly generated instances with up to 12 spins reveals that, while this trend does not hold universally, more than 70% of instances exhibit monotonically increasing sampling fairness as the penalty coefficient increases, even at the largest system size studied. These results show that increasing the penalty coefficient improves sampling fairness, though at the cost of ground-state probability under practical annealing conditions, and call for a deeper theoretical understanding of unfair sampling in constrained optimization problems.
arXiv:2604.11449 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2604.11449v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.11449 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 303 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Scaling Quantum Optimization to the Thousand-Qubit Scale with Distributed Quantum Sampling
arXiv · 9 oct. 2026

Researchers Execute Quantum Algorithm on 110-Node Network Traffic Benchmark
Quantum Zeitgeist · 10 iun. 2026
Superlinear Quantum Query Lower Bounds for Subgraph Detection
arXiv · 1 oct. 2026
Learning parameter curves in feedback-based quantum algorithms
arXiv · 2 oct. 2026