analiza aiqbench
This research investigates how stack-based language models handle cross-serial dependencies and working memory constraints to explain typological biases in natural languages. By analyzing performance on artificial languages, the study offers new insights into the structural limitations of current model architectures regarding hierarchical pattern learning.
Typological Alignment of Stack-Based Language Models on Mildly Context-Sensitive Artificial Languages
arXiv:2610.02040v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Some properties of languages, e.g., subject-object-verb (SOV) word order, are more prevalent than others among the thousands of attested natural languages (NLs). Such typological commonality is often attributed to learning biases. Computational simulations, recently with language models (LMs), have facilitated the exploration of this theory. In this paper, we extend existing analyses of the relationship between LMs' learning biases and typological commonality on both data and model sides, focusing on: (i) cross-serial dependencies, the upper limit of attested syntactic complexity, and (ii) stack-based LMs (SLMs), potentially facilitating learning of hierarchical patterns. We first evaluate generalization of SLMs on cross-serial dependencies across diverse artificial languages and confirm that they struggle with such constructions. However, SLMs with limited working memory generalize better suggesting a possible basis for such inductive bias and thus the typological commonality of some word order configurations.
Abstract:Some properties of languages, e.g., subject-object-verb (SOV) word order, are more prevalent than others among the thousands of attested natural languages (NLs). Such typological commonality is often attributed to learning biases. Computational simulations, recently with language models (LMs), have facilitated the exploration of this theory. In this paper, we extend existing analyses of the relationship between LMs' learning biases and typological commonality on both data and model sides, focusing on: (i) cross-serial dependencies, the upper limit of attested syntactic complexity, and (ii) stack-based LMs (SLMs), potentially facilitating learning of hierarchical patterns. We first evaluate generalization of SLMs on cross-serial dependencies across diverse artificial languages and confirm that they struggle with such constructions. However, SLMs with limited working memory generalize better suggesting a possible basis for such inductive bias and thus the typological commonality of some word order configurations.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.02040 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.02040v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02040 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 233 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · 18 sept. 2026
Personas in a Pre-Internet Language Model
LessWrong · 13 oct. 2026

MedPAIR: Measuring Whether Physicians and AI Agree on What Matters in Medical QA
Snorkel AI Blog · 2 oct. 2026
Synthetic document finetuning for instilling positive traits
AI Alignment Forum · 16 iun. 2026