analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a closed-loop threshold-aware training method designed to safely dismiss clearly negative mammograms, significantly reducing radiologist workload while maintaining high cancer detection rates. By recalibrating dismissal thresholds during the training phase and penalizing false negatives near the dismissal region, the model outperforms standard cross-entropy baselines on major medical imaging datasets. The approach demonstrates that selective dismissal can be optimized without compromising patient safety, offering a practical pathway for integrating AI into clinical screening workflows.
TRUST: Threshold-Recalibrated Uncertainty-Safe Training for Certified Dismissal in Breast Cancer Screening
arXiv:2609.00300v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reducing the review of clearly cancer-negative screening mammograms could lower radiologist workload without compromising cancer detection. We propose a closed-loop threshold-aware training strategy in which the dismissal threshold is recalculated during training and used to penalize cancer-positive images that approach the dismissal region. We evaluated the method on NLBS and RSNA using five controlled training configurations, with case-level assessment based on a one-sided 99\% Clopper--Pearson upper bound for cancer prevalence among dismissed cases. The proposed model achieved the highest case-level dismissal rates at both 98\% and 95\% recall targets. On NLBS, dismissal reached 19.74\% and 21.70\%, while the cross-entropy baseline did not meet either recall target. On RSNA, dismissal improved from 7.04\% to 14.31\% and from 13.49\% to 19.69\%. In external RSNA$\to$NLBS evaluation, the proposed model achieved dismissal rates of 12.95\% and 19.87\% at the 98\% and 95\% recall targets, respectively. These results support closed-loop threshold-aware training for high-recall selective dismissal.
Abstract:Reducing the review of clearly cancer-negative screening mammograms could lower radiologist workload without compromising cancer detection. We propose a closed-loop threshold-aware training strategy in which the dismissal threshold is recalculated during training and used to penalize cancer-positive images that approach the dismissal region. We evaluated the method on NLBS and RSNA using five controlled training configurations, with case-level assessment based on a one-sided 99\% Clopper--Pearson upper bound for cancer prevalence among dismissed cases. The proposed model achieved the highest case-level dismissal rates at both 98\% and 95\% recall targets. On NLBS, dismissal reached 19.74\% and 21.70\%, while the cross-entropy baseline did not meet either recall target. On RSNA, dismissal improved from 7.04\% to 14.31\% and from 13.49\% to 19.69\%. In external RSNA$\to$NLBS evaluation, the proposed model achieved dismissal rates of 12.95\% and 19.87\% at the 98\% and 95\% recall targets, respectively. These results support closed-loop threshold-aware training for high-recall selective dismissal.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.00300 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2609.00300v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00300 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 251 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Evaluating the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act
LessWrong · 1 oct. 2026

Continual learning might make your blocking monitors nearly useless
AI Alignment Forum · 24 sept. 2026

Microsoft AI CEO says AI threats are real, and Anthropic is making it worse
The Verge · 17 sept. 2026
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · 11 iul. 2026