analiza aiqbench
This comparative study evaluates the efficacy of transformer-based architectures—specifically BART, BERT, and RoBERTa—for automatic text summarization tasks. The analysis focuses on their distinct pretraining strategies and architectural designs to determine optimal suitability for both extractive and abstractive generation methods. By isolating these specific NLP models, the research provides a technical benchmark relevant to practitioners optimizing language model applications.
Transformer Models for Text Summarization: A Comparative Study of BART, BERT, and RoBERTa
arXiv:2608.19200v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Text summarization refers to the task of condensing a document into a shorter version while preserving its key information. Automatic text summarization (ATS), driven by advancements in natural language processing (NLP), has developed rapidly in recent years. ATS methods are commonly categorized by input type (such as single-document or multi-document summarization) and by output type (extractive, abstractive, and hybrid). This article presents a focused review of modern summarization techniques with an emphasis on transformer based models and large language models (LLMs), specifically BERT, RoBERTa and BART. It examines their architectures, pretraining strategies, and their suitability for extractive and abstractive summarization tasks.
Abstract:Text summarization refers to the task of condensing a document into a shorter version while preserving its key information. Automatic text summarization (ATS), driven by advancements in natural language processing (NLP), has developed rapidly in recent years. ATS methods are commonly categorized by input type (such as single-document or multi-document summarization) and by output type (extractive, abstractive, and hybrid). This article presents a focused review of modern summarization techniques with an emphasis on transformer based models and large language models (LLMs), specifically BERT, RoBERTa and BART. It examines their architectures, pretraining strategies, and their suitability for extractive and abstractive summarization tasks.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.19200 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.19200v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19200 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Applications (IJAIA), Vol.17, No.3, May 2026
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 209 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · 23 sept. 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · 14 sept. 2026

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · 6 aug. 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026