analiza aiqbench
This paper addresses a critical instability in long-horizon reinforcement learning for large language models by introducing Trajectory-Aware Policy Optimization (TAPO). The method theoretically corrects for state distribution shifts that accumulate over extended trajectories, significantly improving training stability and performance on mathematical reasoning and coding benchmarks. By integrating these corrections into the RL objective function, TAPO offers a robust solution to prevent model collapse in complex, multi-step tasks.
Trajectory-Aware Policy Optimization: Closing the State Distribution Gap in Long-Horizon LLM RL
arXiv:2610.13020v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a dominant paradigm for enhancing LLMs' reasoning capabilities. Yet long-horizon autoregressive rollouts introduce a fundamental limitation: local policy mismatch can compound into severe state distribution shift over trajectories. Existing LLM RL methods, such as GRPO and GSPO, control policy mismatch at the token or sequence level, but overlook this trajectory-induced shift, causing training instability and eventual collapse as the horizon grows. To close the state distribution gap, we propose Trajectory-Aware Policy Optimization (TAPO), a principled framework that theoretically derives the state-distribution correction from the off-policy policy gradient and incorporates it into the RL objective. TAPO further employs a geometric-mean estimator for variance reduction, together with a length-aware dynamic clipping that prevents overly deviated updates across the trajectory. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TAPO significantly surpasses existing LLM RL algorithms across eight competition-level benchmarks, achieving up to 48% and 12% improvement over GRPO on mathematical reasoning and algorithmic coding, with substantially enhanced training stability.
Abstract:Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a dominant paradigm for enhancing LLMs' reasoning capabilities. Yet long-horizon autoregressive rollouts introduce a fundamental limitation: local policy mismatch can compound into severe state distribution shift over trajectories. Existing LLM RL methods, such as GRPO and GSPO, control policy mismatch at the token or sequence level, but overlook this trajectory-induced shift, causing training instability and eventual collapse as the horizon grows. To close the state distribution gap, we propose Trajectory-Aware Policy Optimization (TAPO), a principled framework that theoretically derives the state-distribution correction from the off-policy policy gradient and incorporates it into the RL objective. TAPO further employs a geometric-mean estimator for variance reduction, together with a length-aware dynamic clipping that prevents overly deviated updates across the trajectory. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TAPO significantly surpasses existing LLM RL algorithms across eight competition-level benchmarks, achieving up to 48% and 12% improvement over GRPO on mathematical reasoning and algorithmic coding, with substantially enhanced training stability.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.13020 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.13020v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.13020 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 251 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · 3 aug. 2026
Coverage-driven alignment - What ‘Teaching Claude Why’ can borrow from AV verification
LessWrong · 8 iun. 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · 25 iul. 2026