analiza aiqbench
This research exposes a critical security vulnerability in Large Language Model merging where dormant backdoors activate only after parameter combination, bypassing standard safety audits on individual models. The authors theoretically analyze the geometric conditions triggering this unalignment and propose SMOKE, a meta-learning framework that effectively implants these conditional threats to demonstrate their resilience against current detection methods. This work is essential for understanding the inherent risks in deploying merged model ensembles without rigorous post-merge verification.
Towards Merging-conditional Backdoor Unalignment against Large Language Models
arXiv:2610.14701v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Model merging has become widely adopted for enhancing the task-specific performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) without additional training. While the specialized model from third-party platforms may undergo safety audits (e.g., backdoor detection), we reveal a novel and critical threat: One-sided Merging-Conditional Backdoor (OMCB). OMCB remains dormant and undetectable within one standalone model but activates upon merging, triggering safety unalignment. We first theoretically analyze the existence and geometric location of OMCB, revealing that the parameter shift crossing safety decision boundaries is the main cause of backdoor activation. Building upon this insight, we propose SMOKE, a meta-learning-based attack framework. SMOKE implants OMCB via a bi-level optimization strategy: the inner loop synthesizes surrogate meta-vectors through random low-rank initialization and finite-step maximization, while the outer loop optimizes the target model by simulating the merging process. Furthermore, preliminary analysis shows that the injected OMCB has bounded generalization loss under unknown merging configurations. Extensive experiments across diverse model architectures and merging techniques validate the effectiveness of SMOKE and its resistance to existing backdoor detections, highlighting a significant yet previously overlooked vulnerability in the model merging paradigm.
Abstract:Model merging has become widely adopted for enhancing the task-specific performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) without additional training. While the specialized model from third-party platforms may undergo safety audits (e.g., backdoor detection), we reveal a novel and critical threat: One-sided Merging-Conditional Backdoor (OMCB). OMCB remains dormant and undetectable within one standalone model but activates upon merging, triggering safety unalignment. We first theoretically analyze the existence and geometric location of OMCB, revealing that the parameter shift crossing safety decision boundaries is the main cause of backdoor activation. Building upon this insight, we propose SMOKE, a meta-learning-based attack framework. SMOKE implants OMCB via a bi-level optimization strategy: the inner loop synthesizes surrogate meta-vectors through random low-rank initialization and finite-step maximization, while the outer loop optimizes the target model by simulating the merging process. Furthermore, preliminary analysis shows that the injected OMCB has bounded generalization loss under unknown merging configurations. Extensive experiments across diverse model architectures and merging techniques validate the effectiveness of SMOKE and its resistance to existing backdoor detections, highlighting a significant yet previously overlooked vulnerability in the model merging paradigm.
Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.14701 [cs.CR]
(or arXiv:2610.14701v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14701 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 283 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Korea University Team Presents LLM-Qubo Framework for Multi-Drone Assignment Optimisation
Quantum Zeitgeist · 17 iun. 2026
Bun's Migration from Zig to Rust as a Potential Case Study for Gradual Disempowerment
LessWrong · 8 iun. 2026

Reflections on unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · 20 sept. 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026