Towards Fairness under Label Bias in Image Segmentation: Impact, Measurement and Mitigation

Abstract:Biases in annotation pipelines may introduce label bias: when annotation quality or style varies systematically across demographic subgroups, causing disparities in performance and auditability. Label bias in image segmentation remains underexplored, as even detecting it typically requires clean, unbiased annotations, which are not readily available. We present a Confident Learning framework adapted to segmentation for auditing label bias directly in the training data without a clean, unbiased ground truth. By comparing the provided training labels to the model's confident predictions, we measure the prevalence and direction of suspected label errors; where standard overlap metrics like Dice fail. We further show that label bias influences subgroup separability in the encoder's feature space, an artifact we leverage for bias mitigation rather than suppressing it. We evaluate three datasets spanning from synthetic to real-life bias and across experimental conditions, showing how our framework produces proxy audit signals without clean labels and mitigates disparities with a correctly identified cleaner reference group.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2605.06891 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.06891v2 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.06891 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.