analiza aiqbench
This arXiv preprint proposes Subspace Tuning (SST), a fine-tuning method that limits each weight update to the bottom singular subspace of a model's weight matrices, which the authors report reduces catastrophic forgetting and KL drift from the base model. The results are self-reported and come from an abstract, so the claims of near-eliminated forgetting at large scale need validation against independent benchmarks and a fuller methods section. For practitioners, the key question is whether the retention gains hold across tasks and model families without sacrificing target-task performance.
Towards Continual Learning: Mitigating Forgetting With Subspace Tuning
arXiv:2610.22293v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) acquire new skills through fine-tuning, but it can destroy capabilities they already have: catastrophic forgetting remains a central obstacle to continual learning in LLMs. Recent works connect forgetting to how far, and along which directions, fine-tuning moves the weights. On-policy methods such as reinforcement learning and on-policy distillation avoid updating the principal singular directions of weight matrices and thus forget less. In contrast, SFT concentrates updates along these directions and is susceptible to catastrophic forgetting. In this work, we introduce Subspace Tuning (SST), which restricts each weight update to the bottom singular subspace, eliminating changes along the principal directions. SST is optimizer-agnostic and composes well with fine-tuning recipes including SFT and self-distillation. SST combines tight subspace protection, dense gradient estimation, and a simple refresh mechanism, enabling stronger learning than prior orthogonal fine-tuning methods. With these mechanisms, protecting as much as 99\% of the weight subspace substantially improves retention while preserving strong target-task performance. This behavior strengthens with model and data size and nearly eliminates forgetting in the large-model regime. SST also keeps the model close to its base distribution, inducing $2$--$4\times$ less KL drift than the baseline recipes. Overall, SST advances the learning--forgetting Pareto frontier, making it a practical default for fine-tuning pre-trained language models.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) acquire new skills through fine-tuning, but it can destroy capabilities they already have: catastrophic forgetting remains a central obstacle to continual learning in LLMs. Recent works connect forgetting to how far, and along which directions, fine-tuning moves the weights. On-policy methods such as reinforcement learning and on-policy distillation avoid updating the principal singular directions of weight matrices and thus forget less. In contrast, SFT concentrates updates along these directions and is susceptible to catastrophic forgetting. In this work, we introduce Subspace Tuning (SST), which restricts each weight update to the bottom singular subspace, eliminating changes along the principal directions. SST is optimizer-agnostic and composes well with fine-tuning recipes including SFT and self-distillation. SST combines tight subspace protection, dense gradient estimation, and a simple refresh mechanism, enabling stronger learning than prior orthogonal fine-tuning methods. With these mechanisms, protecting as much as 99\% of the weight subspace substantially improves retention while preserving strong target-task performance. This behavior strengthens with model and data size and nearly eliminates forgetting in the large-model regime. SST also keeps the model close to its base distribution, inducing $2$--$4\times$ less KL drift than the baseline recipes. Overall, SST advances the learning--forgetting Pareto frontier, making it a practical default for fine-tuning pre-trained language models.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.22293 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.22293v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22293 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 306 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

Reflections on unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · 20 sept. 2026

Evaluating task vectors, unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · 20 sept. 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · 8 oct. 2026
Information-Theoretic Decoupled Prompt Tuning for Continual Learning
arXiv · 23 sept. 2026