analiza aiqbench
This research introduces a post-hoc recalibration technique specifically designed to ensure probabilistic forecasts are accurate within user-defined regions of interest, such as extreme events. By adapting quantile recalibration to conditional distributions, the method addresses a critical gap where standard schemes fail to correct miscalibration in specific outcome spaces without sacrificing overall accuracy. The approach demonstrates significant utility in high-stakes domains like electricity price forecasting, ensuring reliable predictions when particular outcomes matter most for decision-making.
Towards Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasts for Events of Interest via Outcome-Conditional Recalibration
arXiv:2610.10076v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Calibration is an essential requirement for probabilistic predictions to be useful for decision making. While state-of-the-art prediction methods often yield miscalibrated predictive distributions, several post-hoc recalibration schemes have been proposed to generate calibrated predictions. However, popular recalibration schemes can conceal miscalibration in specific regions of the outcome space. Since particular outcomes, such as extreme events, often matter most for decision making, probabilistic predictions should be calibrated when evaluation is restricted to these outcomes. Hence, in this paper, we introduce outcome-conditional recalibration, a post-hoc method to recalibrate probabilistic predictions on user-defined regions of the outcome space. The method is simple, easy to implement, and can be applied to arbitrary predictive distributions. It works by applying the quantile recalibration approach of Kuleshov et al. (2018) to forecast conditional distributions, before rescaling these conditional distributions so that forecast event probabilities match empirical occurrence frequencies. This produces valid and continuous predictive distributions that are calibrated within each region of interest. Across regression benchmarks, we demonstrate that existing recalibration schemes do not necessarily yield calibrated predictions when interest is on particular outcomes, and that our approach improves outcome-conditional calibration relative to existing conditional and unconditional recalibration methods, while retaining competitive calibration overall. In an application to day-ahead electricity price forecasting, the approach substantially improves calibration when predicting negative prices, at negligible cost to forecast accuracy.
Abstract:Calibration is an essential requirement for probabilistic predictions to be useful for decision making. While state-of-the-art prediction methods often yield miscalibrated predictive distributions, several post-hoc recalibration schemes have been proposed to generate calibrated predictions. However, popular recalibration schemes can conceal miscalibration in specific regions of the outcome space. Since particular outcomes, such as extreme events, often matter most for decision making, probabilistic predictions should be calibrated when evaluation is restricted to these outcomes. Hence, in this paper, we introduce outcome-conditional recalibration, a post-hoc method to recalibrate probabilistic predictions on user-defined regions of the outcome space. The method is simple, easy to implement, and can be applied to arbitrary predictive distributions. It works by applying the quantile recalibration approach of Kuleshov et al. (2018) to forecast conditional distributions, before rescaling these conditional distributions so that forecast event probabilities match empirical occurrence frequencies. This produces valid and continuous predictive distributions that are calibrated within each region of interest. Across regression benchmarks, we demonstrate that existing recalibration schemes do not necessarily yield calibrated predictions when interest is on particular outcomes, and that our approach improves outcome-conditional calibration relative to existing conditional and unconditional recalibration methods, while retaining competitive calibration overall. In an application to day-ahead electricity price forecasting, the approach substantially improves calibration when predicting negative prices, at negligible cost to forecast accuracy.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.10076 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2610.10076v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.10076 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 317 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · 30 iul. 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · 2 oct. 2026

AXRP Episode 50 - Eli Lifland on AI 2027
LessWrong · 3 aug. 2026

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · 27 sept. 2026