analiza aiqbench
This paper advances the theoretical understanding of inference-time alignment by framing it as a weak-to-strong learning problem under unknown reward conditions. It introduces an "alignment dimension" to characterize learnability within the PAC framework, offering a rigorous statistical foundation distinct from existing supervised fine-tuning approaches. These results provide critical insights for developing robust generative models that can generalize effectively without relying on perfect reward estimates.
Towards a theory of inference-time alignment with unknown rewards
arXiv:2608.15402v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative model alignment has received broad interest, and significant progress has been made in supervised fine-tuning and inference-time computation. Yet, alignment has remained poorly understood from a statistical learning perspective. We formulate inference-time alignment as a weak-to-strong learning problem, where a reference policy (weak learner) is assumed to be fairly good and the goal is to produce a strong learner that predicts a good response at test time with arbitrarily high probability. Our problem is formulated as learning from scratch --- everything is learned from data rather than assuming access to a good reward estimate, and thus differs from the existing inference-time alignment theory. Our model shares similarity to the recent work of arXiv:2510.15464, where for each prompt, there could be multiple good responses. Our definition of the alignment learnability follows the PAC learning principle. We introduce a novel combinatorial dimension of the reward class which we call the alignment dimension, and show that it completely characterizes the alignment learnability --- a reward class is alignment learnable if and only if its alignment dimension is finite. The core of our learning procedure works by invoking the ordinary one-inclusion graph algorithm to run a tournament over all pairs of label sets satisfying that neither is a subset of the other. We believe our results might shed light on establishing a complete theoretical understanding towards alignment.
Abstract:Generative model alignment has received broad interest, and significant progress has been made in supervised fine-tuning and inference-time computation. Yet, alignment has remained poorly understood from a statistical learning perspective. We formulate inference-time alignment as a weak-to-strong learning problem, where a reference policy (weak learner) is assumed to be fairly good and the goal is to produce a strong learner that predicts a good response at test time with arbitrarily high probability. Our problem is formulated as learning from scratch --- everything is learned from data rather than assuming access to a good reward estimate, and thus differs from the existing inference-time alignment theory. Our model shares similarity to the recent work of arXiv:2510.15464, where for each prompt, there could be multiple good responses. Our definition of the alignment learnability follows the PAC learning principle. We introduce a novel combinatorial dimension of the reward class which we call the alignment dimension, and show that it completely characterizes the alignment learnability --- a reward class is alignment learnable if and only if its alignment dimension is finite. The core of our learning procedure works by invoking the ordinary one-inclusion graph algorithm to run a tournament over all pairs of label sets satisfying that neither is a subset of the other. We believe our results might shed light on establishing a complete theoretical understanding towards alignment.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.15402 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.15402v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15402 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 318 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

An unexamined cause of the OpenAI Hugging Face hacking incident: its binary performance metric
LessWrong · 23 sept. 2026

“Alignment Engineering” vs. “Misalignment Science”
LessWrong · 5 oct. 2026
Debating RSI, the US-China Gap, and Jaggedness with JS Denain of Epoch AI
Interconnects · 22 sept. 2026

Game-Theoretic Disempowerment: Loss of Control to Agencyless AI
LessWrong · 27 sept. 2026